bstix

joined 3 years ago
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, it won't make much difference to a shirt, but it's necessary for a blazer or outerwear, where the fabric is thicker and the button is getting pulled a lot more.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 6 points 1 year ago

I don't want to.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

Det samme skete i Stockholm.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/08/stockholm-rejects-us-letter-urging-city-to-reverse-diversity-initiatives

De har tilsyneladende sendt det til alle leverandører, uanset om det er private eller offentlige.

Nu har de så mulighed for at kalde en ydelse kritisk og dermed slække på kravet. Jeg vil så mene at alt hvad en ambassade foretager sig er kritisk.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

It's the same method.

The distance between the sun and 12 is divided by two, because the clock face only shows half the day.

If we had a clock with 24 hours in the circle and used the same method, it'd be the same as pointing at the sun and saying: South is where the sun will be at noon.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Step 8. The toothpick is used to loosen the loops and make distance between the button and the fabric. This is necessay. The button would be too tight to function properly otherwise.

Step 9 is to remove the toothpick and sew upwards under the button, but not through the button.

Steps 10-12. Since the sewing isn't tightened down, you'll need to secure it by wrapping the string around it a couple of times. (This is why you don't sew through the button in step 9).

Steps 13-rest. Sew through the existing loops and tie a knot to secure the thread.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eating ass is someone's personal Vietnam.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's wishful thinking or hindsight at best. Bernie would not have won 2016. The voters at the time were already drunk on burning the place down.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ja okay, du har ret. Jeg kalder det for gulvvarme teorien.

Gulvvarme er mere effektivt end radiatorer, men folk skruer bare mere op for varmen. Jeg kender flere som mener at man kun har t-shirt på indendørs, selv om vinteren.

Så jo, det kan godt være at jeg sparer strøm med mine hvidevarer, men hvis de nye hvidevarer i butikkerne generelt er større, så bruger befolkningen det samme strøm.

Degrowth sker dog lige nu på oksekød. Prisen er åbenbart afgørende. Surprise pikachu.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago

The real question is why we even bother discussing a curve which was pulled out of the ass of a man who went on to invent a hydralic computer to model the national economy of the United Kingdom. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_Machine

I think his greatest achievement was to demonstrate the concept of being a really clever idiot.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah that'll be a nice waste of time for the lawyers who think they'll be paid for doing a massive investigation.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wtf. Complete gibberish. The idiot doesn't even understand the direction of a transaction.

How can ... Democrats paying some Bruce guy to play guitar... be an illegal campaign contribution. To the Democrats?

I have to wonder if he ever learned how a payment works. He grew up rich. Did he ever purchase anything from a store in which you get something and then pay for it by giving the store money?

Is he really on that level of stupidity?

This explains everything.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 year ago

It's not directly banned in Denmark. It's basically non-existent, and as such difficult to find people who cares enough about banning it.

Indirectly it is already illegal, because it's illegal to treat anyone for anything against their will. This includes children.

However, there are still people who send their children to a therapist or a doctor. I don't know if a ban would change their minds in any way. Perhaps it's better that the parents get to have that conversation with a doctor instead of just being angry at a law and seeking help at alternative places through religion or whatever. They'd probably do that with or without a law anyway, so if anything, it's actually better if they have the opportunity to talk to a professional therapist first without just getting told off.

Politicians don't want to deal with it. They're afraid the backlash from people who are against all things "woke", would be bigger than the support from anyone who actually cares about the virtue signaling.

If the practice is actually widespread and secretly done in religious circles, we would benefit from hearing those stories.

view more: ‹ prev next ›