Interestingly enough; this hasn’t happened yet.
Most gun enthusiasts are all barrel and no bullets.
They got the guns in the first place because they're actually scared little boys with an inferiority complex. No amount of guns toys will ever compensate for their small dick energy.
It will be interesting to see if the new market has a better use for the arms.
Jeg synes det er lidt sjovt at bybusser omtales som kritisk infrastruktur. Truslen er sådan set bare at man skal tage cyklen istedet for bussen, hvis det en dag går helt galt.
It's difficult to frame a clown in a funny way. They just embrace it.
Nej, der er ikke krav om stregkode på kvitteringer. Det er også kun noget som bruges til at identificere salget i den virksomhed som evt. skal tage det retur. Dette for at sikre at det er den rigtige pris og at tidsfristen er overholdt osv.
Problemet nævnt her i artiklen er refusion af udlæg. Altså at en ansat går ind til chefen med en bon og beder om refusion for noget de har købt i arbejdsøjemed. Det vil slet ikke kunne løses med stregkoder.
Hvis personen har lagt ud for en fysisk ting, så kan man ret nemt kontrollere om tingen faktisk findes, men hvis en sælger kommer med en bon på restaurantbesøg med kunder, så er det mere vanskeligt at vide om det faktisk har fundet sted.
Løsningen er ret ligetil: Lad være med at refundere udlæg mod kvitteringer. Udbetal i stedet diæt-penge og accepter at det er cost-of-business.
Det er spild af alles tid at fedte rundt med kvitteringer, som aldrig passer med virkeligheden uanset om det er bevidst snyd eller ej.
Same.
I figure I won't die as long as I kep skating. Skate or die, right?
Stolen ashtrays etc. was almost free marketing distribution.
If the couple in bed wanted to talk, they could just call each other.
I disagree. Absolute profits would be the realistic option. The supplier is not adding to their profits due to the tariffs or whatever caused this, and the customer are surely as fuck also not getting more money.
She's the only one in the chain that gets paid more when increasing her margin by percentages.
Of course there's more to it than an example, and yes, someone else will be able to outbid her. The larger chains can easily do that while still maintaining their profits.
When someone dies in Mario multiplayer there's a short pause in the gameplay. It really fucks up everyone else's timing.
Yeah, it wouldn't make sense even if they drop shipped beans directly to customers, as in, let's forget about costs to staff, shops and other services.
The purchase price and sales price are not directly related like that.
She's effectively increasing her own revenue and profit by more than the increase in cost price.
I'm sure you already know this, but let's break it down, because apparently a lot of people don't seem to grasp this.
Let's say a bean used to cost 100 and she'd sell it for 200 making 100 in profit.
Now let's add 15% to both, so a bean costs 115 and she sells it for 230, making her profits 115. The extra 15 in profit simply appeared out of nowhere, because she made the wrong calculation.
If she wanted to fairly increase the sales price by the change in cost price, she should've maintained her profits at 100 and made the sales price 215. The sales price should only rise by 7.5% in this example.
This is exactly what's causing inflation, and doubling the effects of the tariffs and other costs price increases.
So sure, she could argue that because of inflation, everything is increasing so she needs more profits to cover her base costs, but please keep focused here: Those things should already be in the calculation of sales price. The profit is the excess and thereby not required to cover any of the costs any more than they already do. The same calculation can be done on each of them and none of it would justify adding the same percentage to her own mark up.
It's pure greed.
That was also the period when the introduction of tire pressure sensors created brand new issue that people never had before.
They were part of WW2.