News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I keep reading this, I don't think it adds up in the way that coffee shops are claiming.
When you a buy a coffee you're paying for beans, sure. But mainly the expenditure of a coffee place is it's staff, premises, taxes, equipment, water, electric and all the other overheads.
40% in a year is massive, but what does a lb make? 50 cups of coffee?
So the cost of the beans went up 8c and she puts her prices up 50c and says it's the beans.
Yeah, it wouldn't make sense even if they drop shipped beans directly to customers, as in, let's forget about costs to staff, shops and other services.
The purchase price and sales price are not directly related like that.
She's effectively increasing her own revenue and profit by more than the increase in cost price.
I'm sure you already know this, but let's break it down, because apparently a lot of people don't seem to grasp this.
Let's say a bean used to cost 100 and she'd sell it for 200 making 100 in profit.
Now let's add 15% to both, so a bean costs 115 and she sells it for 230, making her profits 115. The extra 15 in profit simply appeared out of nowhere, because she made the wrong calculation.
If she wanted to fairly increase the sales price by the change in cost price, she should've maintained her profits at 100 and made the sales price 215. The sales price should only rise by 7.5% in this example.
This is exactly what's causing inflation, and doubling the effects of the tariffs and other costs price increases.
So sure, she could argue that because of inflation, everything is increasing so she needs more profits to cover her base costs, but please keep focused here: Those things should already be in the calculation of sales price. The profit is the excess and thereby not required to cover any of the costs any more than they already do. The same calculation can be done on each of them and none of it would justify adding the same percentage to her own mark up.
It's pure greed.
Perfect! You just summed up the problem more clearly and concisely than I have seen in any mainstream media.
But I see this kind of coffee shop maths everywhere going completely unchallenged. Company statements just printed wholesale.
What makes you say this is going into her profit? There's a lot of competition in coffee shops, so if what you say it's true there'll be someone undercutting her.
It's more likely that besides beans her other costs have gone up, too.
It also doesn't make sense to maintain absolute profits instead of a percentage margin. Low margin means that you aren't hedging as much against risk (if your stock is destroyed in a fire you have to pay the cost of the stock, which has increased) and aren't paying yourself any more in the face of the rising costs YOU are paying every day.
This idea does not adequately address reality.
I disagree. Absolute profits would be the realistic option. The supplier is not adding to their profits due to the tariffs or whatever caused this, and the customer are surely as fuck also not getting more money.
She's the only one in the chain that gets paid more when increasing her margin by percentages.
Of course there's more to it than an example, and yes, someone else will be able to outbid her. The larger chains can easily do that while still maintaining their profits.
Why do you not think the other links are setting their prices in this way?