Not really what the article is about
balance8873
joined 1 month ago
Article seems to be exaggerating this like...a lot. Seems to just be saying you can't only fix climate change and magically the world will be a better place.
Shouldn't this headline be "supreme court allows trump to dodge responsibilities for another week"? The court order was more focused on enabling godking trump than on whatever silly poor people shit they were supposed to be deciding.
Context is important and voyager does not provide that. Many people respond to the wrong person in threads. For example you just replied to me about pronouns which isn't my topic.
Chipotle Mexican Grill ... faulted consumer weakness for disappointing sales
Interesting phrasing
That's Andy to his co-rapists
That's silly, why should I treat someone who wants to destroy the planet as they want to be treated?
The question was framed in such a way to try to get her to shit on Biden.
Newsom is very conservative and fucks over the poor rather than couches
You keep repeating this quote but you're either misinformed or lying about the context. I'm not saying what she said had good optics, I am saying what she said isn't what you're claiming.
Given how conservatives think, I'd guess he hired exclusively people who depend on this job for their visa.
What exactly is your point