backgroundcow

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

These two are not interchangeable or really even comparable though?

For GNU Make, yes they are. These are fully comparable tools for writing sophisticated dynamic build systems. "Plain make", not so much.

[cmake] makes your build system much, much more robust, far easier to maintain, much more likely to work on other systems than your own, and far easier to integrate with other dependent projects.

This is absolutely incorrect. I assume (although I have never witnessed it) that a true master of cmake could use it to create a robust, maintainable, transferable build system. Very much like there are people who are able to make delicate ice sculptures using a chainsaw. But in no way does these properties follow from the choice of cmake as a build system (as insinuated in your post), rather, the word we are looking for here is: despite using cmake.

I apologize for my inflammatory language. I may just have a bit of PTSD from having to build a lot of other people's software through multiple layers of meta build systems. And cmake comes back, time and time again, as introducing loads of obstacles.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Thanks for giving the link and making this an easy 1-click thing. Just donated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

On the topic of things to never forgive Redhat about, aren't there other things that are more pressing? Like, inventing a whole scheme to circumvent the idea of the GPL license via service contract blackmail?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I couldn't agree more. If there only was a somewhat user-friendly setting that allowed the oom killer to be far more aggressive, killing or freezing processes as soon as their memory use starts to affect system responsiveness, and just tell me this is what has happened.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

ADA should be the lawful good.

Bash is chaotic neutral.

Java is lawful neutral.

Javascript fits ok as chaotic evil.

Move ASM to neutral evil.

And maybe f77 as lawful evil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's On Me, I Set the Bar Too Low

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I bought a low profile, low power A380 for a minitower linux machine to get something with enough power to smoothly run a modern high resolution desktop with minimal heat and sound. It has worked exactly as I hoped! Driver support seems perfectly solid, in comparison with my prior machine on a GTX750Ti. Hardware video decoding for modern codecs, variable refresh rate, etc. It have just been a solid trouble-free experience, which has been unusual in my prior experiences with Linux GPU support.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Something utterly meaningless, like a bag of generic candy, from the closest corner store "wrapped" only in that store's type of plastic bags, clearly purchased last-minute on your way over to them. As they unwrap it you slip an "oh, I forgot to take that" and snatch up the receipt that you've forgotten in the bag, but only after they've seen that the item was on sale for $0.99.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

Reading.

We need everyone to read more books. A wide variety of stories on a wide variety of topics by a wide variety of authors, all with different backgrounds and ideas. We must read stories that let us temporarily step into the mind and experiences of other people, who aren't us, to train our brains the ability to understand the plights of others. Books of human stories, as opposed to movies, doom-scrolling TikTok, etc., seems uniquely suited for this kind of training of empathy, because the stories are executed inside our own brains.

I'm willing to bet that these why-are-the-leopards-suddenly-eating-my-face? the-only-moral-abortion-is-my-abortion type people have read distinctly less, or at least far less varied, stories than us who look at them and wonder how it is possible to be so unable to put themselves in the shoes of anyone but themselves.

view more: next ›