Yes, correct, and the title does not say AGPL or libre software. 'Open source service' is a nonsense.
autonomoususer
Yes, don't stop, aim higher. Any doctor, lawyer or engineer could sell tyres but they're speed running greater goals. You haven't lost yet.
'Open source', a phrase deliberately engineered with several different meanings, is very effective at scamming us out of libre software.
A service cannot have a software license. It is a service, not software. We are not bound by a software license when someone else runs their software on their device.
LUKS headerless volume
Cringe, pirated software fails to include a libre software license text file, like GPL. We do not control it, anti-libre software.
You can do that for them, you can show them. Apple want us to feel alone but we are not. Want to really fix privacy? Make in-person groups. Apple wants us alone. It helps Apple and Google takeover.
Not sure but I get the question now.
whether Apple's evil here is business as usual, or particularly pernicious
Both have the same result for our privacy.
people all over the world
They always try to make us feel alone but we are not. The easiest way to fix privacy is to make an in-person group with people you know. Then it only takes one of you to find something for the whole group to see it.
youtube.com/watch?v=9ER1cTZ5Gxk
More often, only those lying about the AGPL being restrictive are the scammers it protects us from, those taking libre software and turning it into anti-libre software, taking software we do control and turning it into software we do not control. Copyleft libre software licenses like the AGPL defend us from this but all libre software licenses help protect our privacy.
The Apple App store straight up disallows AGPL and GPL licensed code on it.
No surprise we get no privacy from software we do not control.
It's centralised, bad: We know!
But how many people have YOU rescued from WhatsApp, anti-libre software?