Heck of a necro but glad it's still a useful comment.
Warl0k3
But that's extremely damaging to the narrative, so we're just gonna... ignore it.
Tbf I've had several cats that went -bonkers- for broccoli...
Thank you, jfc this shit is tiring to keep up with.
Please tell me this isn't real, I've lost the ability to guess.
It's really not.
Spoiler alert: It's way better than it was, but it's still not very good.
At least the name gives you a really good idea of the philosophy driving their UX...
edit: no hang on I meant "the people that choose the name also define the project's philosophy"
(Well done, you got the joke!)
The "fundamental systemic inequalities" that would help us poor unintelligent rubes are things like hospitals and public transit.
Uh, yeah, I know. Everyone knows, in fact. Thats why healthcare reform and expansions to public transit are two of the absolute cornerstones of liberal policy. You're really all about this victim mindset but it's clear you've just been convinced that's the rational conclusion, you haven't arrived at that conclusion by weighing up the evidence or anything.
I'd argue that education funding and expansion of social services are two more super critical things that have been yanked out from under rural communities, but it's not like it's literally my job to answer questions like "how can we improve food security for underserved communities" or "how specifically is rural healthcare access inadequate" or anything.
But lucky for you, nothing you're saying here really matters! We're going to keep trying to address the systemic problems you've been saddled with no matter how bitter and blind to your own behavior you are! Rejoice, rural person! Venerate urbanism! Celebrate the boons we give you!
Yep that's pretty much how it works! Sucks, doesn't it?
"None, they just let it burn out then beat the room for being black"