Jesus Christ, you just made a compelling argument on behalf of rage comics. I'm pleasantly impressed.
Typhoonigator
joined 2 years ago
On top of everything others have said, there's no watermark, signature, url, etc from an original artist. Webcomics like this will always have one unless it's removed by a reposter, which yeah, that happens, but I feel not as often these days. And when it does, it's a pretty shitty thing to do, and not a good situation either.
Thirty or forty more mistakes like this, and I might start to think this Susan Collins might not be a good judge of character
What, they're accusing him of being part of their administration?
Is it? The ai 'art' I've seen is usually more inconsistent on its lettering. Though it keeps improving, for better or for worse.
"You people are literally batshit crazy"
Literally 1 comment later:
"Here comes the name calling because you can't have a conversation."
I mean, by that metric, we've got decades of evidence
I've never heard this before, but what a useful saying
I remember that. I tried searching for the clip, but of course all the old Daily Show clips aren't available any more. I found a couple of articles (one even with embedded video that no longer works), but here's the wikipedia article on this specific event.
For what it's worth, here's a 12 year old video where he walks it back a little.
view more: next ›
Randall definitely has significant artistic talent, but there are hundreds of examples from xkcd that absolutely support the argument.