Apparently nearly every girl in Brazil has them, and they all encourage each other to have work done.
You are being ridiculous and calling me names. Grow up, slow down, read what I've said and actually think about it. Instead of just acting irrationally and emotional.
I didn't say not to respond, I said not to do the exact same thing he's doing.
Import tariffs are a tax on local people. Raising taxes must be justified. In particular, there must be a plan to spend the money raised through tariffs.
Trump has not given any plan, because he is almost certainly going to steal the money.
If any other country wants to implement a tariff, they must do so with a plan to better their country with the tariff revenue, otherwise they're no better than Trump. You are, in fact, trying to encourage them to do this with no plan. You are enabling other politicians to be like Trump.
Don't do that.
No, a good tariff includes a plan on what to do with tariff revenue. Ideally, such a plan should re-invest into incentives for local businesses to replace the foreign ones.
An import tariff is a tax on citizens. Taxes must be justified.
The effect of tariffs nationally should be considered before the international effects. Especially with import tariffs.
If you want a good tariff to target America, you should look at export tariffs. This is generally seen as less favourable, as this often means reduced sales for local businesses, but the actual payment is borne by the other nation. Canada has been doing this with their export tariffs on electricity to the US, and that seems to be a truly effective bargaining chip because the US can't stop buying it, so Canadian businesses don't actually see lost sales. It's literally Canada charging the US more for the same.
Import tariffs mean less business for the other country, but more expense for your people.
Export tariffs mean less business for your country, but more expense for their people.
Both result in raising tax revenue for your country. This is why governments are entertaining the idea of tariffs, not because they're good for their country necessarily, but because it might be a very good political opportunity for them to raise more money.
What makes the tariff good for the country is what the money is spent on. Trump will not spend it on America, he will steal it. If other countries want to create tariffs they should at least have a plan to make good use of the money, otherwise they're no better than Trump.
She narced on herself to Canada, then America overheard.
Exactly. Canada refused her entry first, then when America learned why they detained her.
She should have been deported and put on the next flight at her expense, not detained for nearly 3 weeks, but she definitely fucked up and took the piss with her visa.
You seem like you're being willfully ignorant and clinging to that.
I've explained the reason: BECAUSE CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY THAT SETS THE TARIFF PAYS THE TARIFF.
Americans won't pay the retaliatory tariff. A retaliatory tariff will only have a small effect on American businesses. It will have a big effect on citizens of the country that set the tariff.
Not setting a tariff isn't appeasing Trump. It's taking the wellbeing of your country first, and not getting drawn into a pointless trade war.
Literally the main and most immediate purpose of a tariff is to raise money for the government. America is taxing Americans with a tariff, but they have no plan to spend that money (because Trump is going to steal it). If other governments are also going to raise money through their own tariff tax, then they should do so with a plan to spend the money on their country - they shouldn't just copy Trump and do what he does, BECAUSE THAT WILL HURT THEIR OWN CITIZENS, JUST LIKE TRUMP IS HURTING AMERICANS.
New mission unlocked lol
They do a 60W C to C cable, that should definitely provide other charging modes. Probably 3A at 20V.
3A at 5V would be fairly slow, yes, but you don't get higher power levels by just increasing the current - in fact most charging modes don't go above 3A. I expect the other cables also allow for higher charging voltages.
Heat loss is proportional to current squared, so keeping current down is ideal.
We do actually need more of this, non-Chinese cable manufacture. USB cables these days contain microcontrollers (to negotiate charging power, it's not just between the device and charger anymore but a 3-way decision including the cable) and these microcontrollers can have all sorts of dodgy functionality on top - but are still indistinguishable through most inspection methods. Such functionality can include wifi hotpots allowing remote configuration and script injectors to hack devices plugged in.
This problem is so significant that Microsoft changed how Windows handles USB devices and made many existing USB to RS232 serial leads non-functional in Windows 11.
However €25 for a single 1m USB A to C cable is insane. That would be like €3 on Amazon or eBay.
I wonder if the fake doctor's syringe had as much air in it as the one in the stock photo.