ThomasCrappersGhost

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

Probably achieved a lot of stuff by bullying, or what is basically bullying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I’m not sure I get you…but either using components that are imported, and having to pay tax on that, or “they’ve increased their prices so I am”.

If I’ve totally got this wrong I apologise.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“Projected profit” versus “actual profit”. Thank you, cause I’ve always wondered how a company can make a profit and high up people in that business can say that the actual workers don’t deserve a pay rise.

The really stupid part is a well paid and well educated work force will create more money than the alternative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

lol. Bit of an error there on my part.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago

His company has bought his company? That doesn’t sound right even in USA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How does production of physical cash and movement of money between accounts compare to crypto?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I agree. I look at it this way…how many of those that claim to be Christian actually have Christian values or live by the Ten Commandments?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

It has a slightly different taste…like an edge to it. Not offensively so, though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Dunno…too long ago for me to remember many details and as I said, I can’t find a source.

FWIW, those events took place in the USA though, and the article I’m referring to specifically mentioned the U.K.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I totally ballsed that up. I’m going to have change it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

And by “economic harm” what he means is asking for a deal that suits him and fucks the other country over.

Edit; had to rewrite this cause I said Trumps deals would be fair.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (19 children)

I can’t find any sources for this now, but a while back I read an article that basically said in the 1500s (roughly) people were starting to turn against the rich holding the bulk of the wealth. So the rich met up with some priests over a tankard of mead and came up with the idea that the church should say the rich deserved their wealth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›