RonSijm

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We also got fully self driving cars in 2 years though, in 2016....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Snowe is sysadmin of programming.dev...

So source: Snowe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're using Entity Framework for the mssql, I doubt that this library would work as a substitute.

Because that linq gets parsed into expression trees and then send to the underlying provider (mssql/mysql etc) to be converted into sql. So if you you some non-standard library those providers won't be able to convert that linq to sql

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Typescript itself is not really getting any faster, just transpiling Typescript to Javascript

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Many people believe that the ToS was added to make Mozilla legally able to train AIs on the collected data.

"Don’t attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence"

So yea Mozilla wrote some terms that where ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways, and 'many people believed' that they did this intentionally and had the worst intentions possible by their interpretation of the new ToS

Then Mozilla rewrote that ToS after seeing how people were interpreting the original ToS:
https://www.theverge.com/news/622080/mozilla-revising-firefox-terms-of-use-data

And yea, now 'many people will believe' that 'Mozilla revised their decision to do this after the backslash' - OR, it was never their intention and now phrased it better after the confusion

People just want to get their pitchforks out and start drama at any possible opportunity without evidence of wrongdoing... Mozilla added stupid stuff to the ToS, ok yea fair enough - but if they actually did "steal user data" - this would be very easily detectable with Wireshark or something

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

"It's against the law to export to china, but they're doing it anyways."

"What if we prevent it by making it even more against the law?"

Right...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

This feels like a personal attack

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Programming.dev is hosting Iceshrimp: https://bytes.programming.dev/

You could host your own instance, or if your opinion-pieces are programming related, post them there

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It probably depends on the level of the criminals and organized crime groups. I saw this Youtube video a couple weeks ago that talks about the history of how organized crime groups were using encrypted communication https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gigIOc_0PKo (And how they were honey-potted by the FBI to use an FBI-hosted service, lol)

Organized crime groups that make 100s of millions should be capable enough to hire skilled developers and sysops to host self-managed services. At some point if they make enough money, investing in self-managed communication becomes preferable over using telegram or signal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No one's questioning why he's sorting it twice?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Also some feedback, a bit more technical, since I was trying to see how it works, more of a suggestion I suppose

It looks like you're looping through the documents and asking it for known tags, right? ({str(db.current_library.tags)}.)

I don't know if I would do this through a chat completion and a chat response, there are special functions for keyword-like searching, like embeddings. It's a lot faster, and also probably way cheaper, since you're paying barely anything for embeddings compared to chat tokens

So the common way to do something like this in AI would be to use Vectors and embeddings: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/embeddings

So - you'd ask for an embedding (A vector) for all your tags first. Then you ask for embeddings of your document.

Then you can do a Nearest Neighbor Search for the tags, and see how closely they match

 
 
view more: next ›