Pickyfan

Awesome

i love this

I see, thank you for the answer 😌

Ooou, I like that, that's really good

I know we are close to the updates so I don't want to ask too many questions, but I am wondering, how will interact with instant shielding abilities like the Gladiator's lethal defense and Liquid willpower? The fading effect will slightly nerf those

Interesting 🤔

Will the shield still be permanent?

No, it did come out of nowhere, I had only disagreed with one of their points before that, which is the stewed meat vs raw meat

And I don't diminish or change anything, why do you get that impression

I have no idea who dekklin is, so I don't know why you think I stalk anyone.

And you telling me to stop butting in. No, I won't stop. It's a community, I'm allowed to interact. If you personally don't like me, block me

Don't try to justify what people did on rpixeldungeon.

I do care what other people think. I don't care if they block me. Blocking is a good way to disingage if you disagree with someone on everything.

The dark blizzard situation was an outlier, that response from them came out of nowhere. However my comment for them was justified, the tournament was skewed towards certain people, half the people weren't having their opinions heard

The stickonreddit situation was a misunderstanding, as they confused me with someone from the discord, and I don't use discord

The vordex situation was also an outlier, as i couldn't figure out what they were talking about and they refused to explain

The hero tier list situation, was actually an argument, but it's because an opinion I strongly have. And was not aggressive and it was not done in a harassing way, so I don't know why you thought it was

Every time someone says anything about warrior or tenacity, I discuss, I don't argue. Most of the time people have misconceptions about them, especially tenacity.

The r/pixeldungeon situation actually was not like this situation at all. There were people actively harassing me for their "personal enjoyment" which escalated to them actually taking it too far, which should never happen for having personal opinions, even with arguments.

Lastly, I'm not opposed to criticism, I'm opposed to some of other people's criticism, which is fine.

I literally don't do any of those things

First of all, I could care less why people block me, they don't need to give a reason

I really don't know what your problem is, but no one is telling me to leave them alone, I'm not harassing or dismissing anyone.

I don't know what warrior discussion you are talking about, it's been so long since I've even been on Lemmy.

And Rivlin's concept was problematic, becaue labeling stuff as "the worst" is going to end up offending anyone who likes those parts of the game. And upvotes favoring "experienced" players, made the whole tournament "rigged". Which also is another reason I wrote this comment, so people can actually have an incentive to look at the full picture instead of looking at the original post and misinterpreting it as "all this stuff must suck because the whole community agreed on it". Well it doesn't, not everyone agreed on everything

And the last bit just tells me you have a problem with my opinions, I'm not contrarian, I do have reasons for liking the stuff that I do, and that's okay, it's my opinion that I never forced upon anyone

Disrespectful how exactly? How do I twist people's words?

Do you know the difference between an argument and a discussion?

You think everything I say is an argument

I'm not trying to shut down this discussion, I only said I was giving context, and you took that as an attack

You say you respect opinions, but you aren't respecting my opinions.

And you are still throwing out personal attacks, for absolutely no reason.

When have I ever attacked anyone for having a different opinion than me?

Giving different opinions is not harassment.

Just downvoting everything I say, is one of the reasons a tournament like this doesn't work, and why it needs more context.

Straight up downvoting and ignoring, skews the result when the tournament is about upvotes

Okay, first of all, stop getting personal for no reason, I don't even know who you are

And "OP" did a horrible job at giving context, that's why I'm commenting in the first place

They said "this is what the community thinks is weak" "there are discussions onwhy these things suck" which are both biased opinions, not context

There are people who disagree, there are people who gave different opinions and you and OP aren't respecting either of them. Just because you think upvotes make a difference doesn't make it so.

I'm literally just giving context

That picture gives 0 context, every item on that picture is there only because they got more votes, it doesn't matter how small the margin was, or how many people disagreed.

All that context is missing, which is why just saying these items "suck" or they are "weak" not correct

It's like saying "my comment got more upvotes, therefore I'm right"