Parodper

Now that you mention that, I seem to recall something similar does already exist in the EU Parliament. Blue Cards, which I think every MEP has a few of.

From the first article (which I admit I just skimmed the top of it):

And to spice things up further, the group is also planning to “hijack” next week’s debate by attending as a group and using the so-called Blue Cards system on each other to allow them to start an impromptu Q&A with the speaker, according to Boeselager, who coordinates the group.

Could be interesting to see how that turns out.

There's a quote in there:

For instance, it is not possible to interrupt a speaker at will, something that's common in many national parliaments.

Where? At least here in Spain, you can't interrupt the speaker when they have the floor. Doing otherwise seems like a recipe for disaster.

Cathedral-style coding isn’t very Open-Source

Cathedral vs bazaar is about development process, nothing to do with source code availability.

Nah, git has a bad command line UX. Which is why the developers are working to make it better, i.e. moving from checkout to switch.

The current system DOES allow it

Technically true, not in practice. On almost half of the provinces (those with less than 4 seats)* you risk your vote going to waste if you don't vote for one of the big two parties.

it’s not a system like the American one, what does not allow it’s the will of the voters

It's the same issue, but worse in their case. The American system also allows it if only the voters massively voted for some third party.

those on the right do not like a center party.

Do they?

* In fact, you could even include those with 5 seats, which would put it over the 50% of provinces and 30% of seats.

Unfortunately the current system doesn't allow a small center party to survive and add nuance to the political scene.

There isn't a binary «veto»/«simple majority». Supermajorities exist, and the Council already has rules like double-majorities to preserver a smaller country's voice. Vetoes only work for small groups, and cause gridlock in all other cases.

Ireland, for instance is constitutionally neutral

That's why article 42 is worded that way. Ireland (and Austria) not being able to contribute directly doesn't mean that the 25 other countries can't act.

Thanks, since the page didn't mention where they had gone to I assumed they were just gone.

Gotta say though, not a fan on using subdomains. It would have been better to have everything under social-network.europa.eu (which I just tried and doesn't have a web page). It's not like there's a limit on number of profiles per instance.

Aren't the Olympics free?

Not that I know of, but here are some between Lemmy and Mastodon:

• Upvotes in Lemmy don't translate to favorites in Mastodon
• From the Mastodon side communities are normal accounts that boost published posts.
• From Mastodon Lemmy's posts are top-level messages (i.e. not a response), and comments are responses to the original message.
• You can post to a Lemmy community from Mastodon by publishing a post and tagging the community (@community_[email protected])