HubertManne

I agree whole hardheadedly. Felt like my last company was like that which was funny because they were also ultra paranoid with security which seemed like a conflicting thing.

I don't see this. is it on a phone maybe?

Historical context is not merely opinion. It boggles my mind that you can use the phrase objective news given whats currently considered news compared to historic context that being further from spin and given verification time is has solid facts.

Then half of npr articles are not news. There is breaking news then there is looking at current issue from a lens of a bit of time. I like those the best actually as breaking news tends to be full of fud but with a few months of time the picture becomes more clear. Then there are things like this taking a current issue and comparing it in a historical context. I find those valuable as well. It would not appear if we were not in a new gilded age but since the same mistakes are being repeated its relevant. Half the article talks about what is going now.

Its annoying as the AMA fought universal healthcare for so long, but that was the older generation of doctors.

people never take things as intended. always over reacting.

I swear I heard terry savage talking about how down the road it could be a good thing on the morning news. I was one room away and I can't be exactly sure but man if the fud is actually being taken up. wow.

Good for them. Maybe they could quit supporting that party majority state wise to show canada how important it is to them.

certainly and sounds like they were doing that. I mean I hope when they kicked tesla out of incentives it did not aptera.

please be daily. please be daily.

I wonder how this compares to limiting hours of calorie consumption. Micro fasting essentially.

Your conservatives don't sound right. Seems some sort of bone is growing on their backs. They should get that looked or before you know it they won't be on their knees anymore.