Electricd

That probably wouldn’t and would obviously be vote manipulation. This situation is pretty rare and is ignored, like on YouTube, because people get bored and most people wont go out of their way to do this

Problem is: Lemmy's algorithm is shit and doesn’t learn from our preferences. If it did, we would see less posts that we dislike

People just can’t stand being disliked. Should we ban people disliking crypto posts? Because damn most of my posts are disliked based on people hating and spreading lies about crypto just because they dislike it

People looking for stuff will find it if they want to, no matter the amount of dislikes

I personally don’t see votes as a way to moderate, they mean much more to me

Can you blame censorship when you’ve voluntarily decided to participate in a network that has a voting for visibility system?

I am free to disrespect them (not voicing it) or their opinion, but I respect their freedom of speech

Everyone is free to downvote me. This is not Reddit, having a lot of downvotes doesn’t ban you, unless you’re in a shitty instance

Because that’s social media we’re talking about. It’s an algorithm. There’s no central authority. The visibility of a post is chosen democratically and freely.

Censorship is removing and banning content. Censorship isn’t bad anyways when there’s a good reason (ex: hate speech)

Anyone that wants to see said content can still freely do it. Censorship would be abusive moderation, like banning someone because they don’t agree with you, essentially removing their freedom of speech. Or actively removing political opponents like lemmy.ml, blahaj…

I personally prefer to downvote what I don't agree with. Why would I want to promote a point of view I don't agree with?

Sorry you’re learning this now but… you just paid through a normal card. The crypto is just sold in real time and makes up the balance

It wouldn’t help in the situation where the payment processor refuses

We need a proper KYC-less way of paying in crypto, and have games that can only be bought in crypto instead of being removed from the store

But regulating crypto is the best way to kill it. It’s a pain to have to go though KYC currently

Revanced is actually open source, but it only has a set of patches for specific apps, while lucky patcher contains generalized patches and is a bit more focused on piracy

That’s why I wanted more transparency

Oui, pour ça que je ne recherche pas d'anti transpirant

Kraken has always passed the reserves tests, are audited from what I remember, and publish proof of reserves for cryptocurrencies that allow it. I don't believe they use fractional reserves.