this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
573 points (98.2% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8296 readers
4 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rglullis@communick.news -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (49 children)

The message is “If you disagree with me, you will be banned”

It used to be that votes were meant to be used as an indicator of the quality of the post according to the community guidelines, not how "agreeable" a comment or post is. This cultural change is one the most toxic behaviors that made Reddit such a crappy place for discussion.

This was already bad on Reddit, but at least there one could avoid this problem because people were used to browse only the subreddits they subscribed to, so niche subreddits could still have some semblance of "good" community participation. On Lemmy, most people browse by /all and lots of them still treat the downvote button as a some mechanism to train an algorithm. These users are the worst.

In the beginning, I was actually sending DMs to people asking them to please not downvote something if they were not part of the community and their reaction was basically "I don't want to see this, so I will downvote to bury it" (completely ignoring the fact that they could simply hide the post or stop browsing by /all).

So, while "banning everyone who downvotes the post" might seem an overreaction, I could definitely see a moderator could flag a vote as coming from a non-community member and use that flag to ignore their votes in the ranking systems, and I would love to have a bot that auto-messages every clueless downvoter explaining the proper netiquette around votes for non-community members.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 8 points 2 months ago (42 children)

I personally prefer to downvote what I don't agree with. Why would I want to promote a point of view I don't agree with?

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 0 points 2 months ago (30 children)

Why would I want to promote a point of view I don’t agree with?

Because you also wouldn't like those that disagree with you to essentially censor you. I.e. the golden rule, do unto others as you would have them do to you. If you don't want to be censored because of your personal opinion, maybe don't do the same to others either.

Now a downvote is not really "censorship", but still, I would say you should still have respect for an opinion that is different from your own (provided it's not a completely unreasonable opinion). That respect should be enough to prevent you from downvoting such an opinion, I feel.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am free to disrespect them (not voicing it) or their opinion, but I respect their freedom of speech

Everyone is free to downvote me. This is not Reddit, having a lot of downvotes doesn’t ban you, unless you’re in a shitty instance

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)