Sure, but that's not the hate being addressed here. Those were comments specifically about there being a black guy as a main character.
The fact that it's a buggy barely playable mess is par for the course for Ubisoft.
ChairmanMeow
joined 2 years ago
Fair enough. It's just that what you seemed to describe as a nonbinary transgender just sounds like nonbinary to me. No reason why they can't want to change their genitalia, no?
Pardon my perhaps limited understanding, but "trans" quite literally means "opposite", so transgender == "opposite gender". "cis" means "same", so "same gender".
Both terms seem to imply that at the very least you fit in the two-gender construct, whereas nonbinary rejects that construct entirely. So I'm fairly certain that a "nonbinary transgender" can't really exist?
Then again everything is not so black and white and labels rarely fully fit, so perhaps it's a case of two partially fitting labels then?
Morocco and Egypt are pretty well developed.
The best tactic I saw for this is immediately declaring that you will steal, but split the money after the game is over.
If they split, you'd get the money and maybe they get half after the game. If they steal, nobody gets anything, so their best option is to go along and 'lose' the game by choosing to split, forfeiting the money.
This is when you reveal you chose split instead, winning for both of you.
What jury?
I mean if the situation is so bad already that Musk had to get the commerce secretary to try and intervene, it must be worse than we think.
Nowhere does it say GHM does it, zionist rat?
I literally quoted it for you. Here, I'll do it again:
As of 4 March 2025, over 50,000 people – 48,405 Palestinian[3][8] and 1,706 Israeli[c] – have been reported killed in the Gaza war according to the official figures of the Gaza Health Ministry
At this point I'm just going to block you because you can't read.
And does the article actually name a different number than the Gaza Health Ministry does? Yes or no?
Are you stupid? If the article lists that the number is 48k, and you can find online that the only party that claims 48k is the Gaza Health Ministry, where do you imagine they got the numbers from? Expain how anyone is misdirecting you if the quoted numbers match exactly with what the Gaza Health Ministry claims?
The Guardian article did not explicitly list a source in that article. But it takes a 2 minute search to find that the only matching source has to be the GHM.
The Guardian: "The number of deaths is approximately 48k."
The GHM: "The number of deaths is approximately 48k."
You, for some reason: "Aha, proof the Guardian isn't citing the GHM number of 48k when they say it's 48k!"
???
At this point you almost certainly have to be trolling to make pro-Palestinians look stupid or something. Thankfully most others I've engaged with here seem to be better understanding.
The Gaza Health Ministry are the ones reporting 48k. That's not a "could" or "maybe", you can easily Google this.
Or just check here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Gaza_war
As of 4 March 2025, over 50,000 people – 48,405 Palestinian[3][8] and 1,706 Israeli[c] – have been reported killed in the Gaza war according to the official figures of the Gaza Health Ministry
There's nothing suspicious or sneaky happening here, your reading comprehension is just not that good.
It's literally what Jordanlund cited as the reason for removal.