The combination of not giving kids independence then complaining how teens and young adults are dependant on their parents is diabolical.
I often look at the independence that kids and teens are given in other countries and wish that I could have been given that sort of a childhood. I seriously think I wouldn't be as socially inept as I am today if I had that.
I don't work directly with PLCs but we do have them at my work. The main thing that makes these different from any other devices is that they typically control physical machines. Which means there is a real danger that them becoming compromised could lead to damaged equipment or even death.
Additionally, many PLCs use older OS versions like xp because their software is notoriously out of date (if it's working why rewrite it when that could introduce safety concerns)
This "urgent" message from CISA does not prove that any of these devices are internet accessible just that if they are then they should be removed. If CISA wanted to require this then they would have released a binding operational directive (BOD) or an emergency directive (ED). Both of which are publicly viewable on their site.
This whole situation is making me strongly consider bringing a burner phone on my next vacation. That way I can wipe it before going through customs.
Remember when 4chan identified someone just from their eyes, brow, and nose?
The bike lock bandit. He ended up being an ethics teacher at a college and got fired for beating people with a bike lock. We just need that sort of investigation here.
If they want to do business in the US then it follows that they would need to follow us law when conducting that business. It is the same reason that valve has to follow California law despite not being headquartered in California.
If that weren't the case then businesses would just move to international waters and claim to only need to follow maritime law.
I would highly recommend actually reading the full text of the bill. It is a lot more than what is in the body of the post.
It is not clear to me whether a site would need to be hosted in the US to fall under this law or if they would just need to be accessible in the US.
I would post the definitions but there are 7 titles under this law and 5 of them each have their own definition.
Edit: just to be clear. I hate this law too. ID requirements will kill many platforms or people will use vpns to circumvent.
gofuckyour.self
Sounds pretty funny. Can't wait to see what is hosted there.
I would guess either 50-50 it is a meme site or pron. No in between.
Highly recommend against relying on your doctor to answer this. Ask your pharmacist. They will likely have a much better idea on the reason for the suggested limit.
git commit --amend --no-edit and git push --force-with-lease
No-edit skips opening an editor for the commit message and just reuses the same message.
Force-with-lease will force push but only if your local is not missing commits that remote has. Ie other people haven't pushed anything since you last pulled.
Stop, if we observe their gender then we collapse the wave form into a single gender.
Schrodinger's gender.
There are plenty of parents that just kick out their kids and drop all support the day they turn 18. It is truly horrific how cruel they are.