1dalm

Europe would be better off just developing their own weapons systems rather than trying to hack a 35.

"Yes, HR, I need to file a complaint. I'm told by all the women here that I'm supposed to be making more than them but that doesn't actually seem to be the case. Will you please look into addressing that discrepancy?"

Any computer can be jailbroken if you have complete access to it.

The question is more, "do you really want to fly a hacked jet"?

"Men aren't relevant".

@whaleross@lemmy.world is right. It is the ultimate acceptance.

Welcome to the club, boys. Now you are on your own. Enjoy the privileged life!

Trans men are men.

So they can just get over it.

Scouting America is a nearly completely volunteer organization. Their technology is generally about 20 years behind because it's all pieced together by volunteers that "kinda done something like this for my company once".

This is clearly fake. You can make an LLM say whatever you want it to say. This one is not even funny.

I'm just talking about a human capability standpoint. Maybe over time a person just develops the stamina to do it, but I'm pretty wiped after a solid 9-hour day. Honestly, my productivity collapses after about 5 hours of solid focused work.

I honestly can't imagine how someone could work 9-9-6.

That blows my mind.

And, if you say “I plead the Fifth” then immediately shut the f*ck up. The cops will try to get you to un-invoke your right to remain silent.

I'm aware of that case, and if you read the language of the bill it doesn't address that situation very well.

That case is a weird one because I actually think both sides, the student and the graduate assistant grader, were wrong. And ultimately I think the GA was more wrong because the GA held the position of authority in the situation. I generally think that those in authority should be held to more strict standards.

In that specific case that you, there was a very clear scoring rubric published that the GA was supposed to follow. (You can find the rubric published online.) There is no possible way a rational person could read the grading rubric and conclude the student deserved a 0. Yes, it was a very stupidly written essay, but it wasn't a zero -not if you follow the published rubric. The student was given a zero only because of religious discrimination. The grader should have followed the rubric. If the grader has followed the rubric then the student still would have likely failed the assignment, but the grader would have been able to justify the grade and would probably have avoided getting disciplined.

That's my position on that. I'm sure you disagree and believe the student was 100% at fault.

I think you should also include the Iraq War. Evangelicals set a lot of their identity in their belief that the War on Terror would be the final Holy War that would bring about the Kingdom of Christ (with them at the top, of course). But instead their holy war turned into an undeniable catastrophe in front of their eyes.

And also Jesus didn't come back like he was supposed to.