321
Maybe sadly, but definitely necessarily in Europe's case.
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
321 points (92.8% liked)
From Europe or about Europe
101 readers
1 users here now
From Europe
or about Europe
Basics:
- This is a curated community but everyone is welcome to post. Please read the rules before engaging.
- Intent of this community is to fit the purpose rather than being popular.
- I encourage browsing content sorted by the time of posting.
Etiquette
- Basic human decency, authenticity, honesty and accountability.
- No witch hunts, no doxxing, no brigading.
- No punching down.
- No approval for authoritarianism.
- No hate speech against groups based on innate traits.
- Aesthetics irrelevant, profanities are human but don’t use them to replace punctuation.
- Downvotes for offtopic only.
Content:
- From Europe or about Europe.
- Europe is Iceland and Georgia but not Israel or Turkey.
- In English for news unless breaking with translation provided. Other European languages are allowed for things where meaning can be inferred from context.
- If source not clear from the URL (like YouTube) please provide author name after a „|” separator in the title.
- No title editorialising unless for unclear or unnecessarily alarmist titles. Change it in a neutral matter or provide non-biased context or wing it as long as it’s descriptive.
- No dupes within reason, new content must contain new information or offer in-depth analysis or opinion. In case of breaking news, if dupes exists decision which one to preserve will not be based on time of posting but on quality and number of comments.
- Direct links only.
- Paywalled content permissible as long as archived version is provided or if breaking news.
- Regular journalism only for news content. No blogs, social media unless from official accounts.
- Prioritise posting concrete actions and deliveries over posting political speech and announcements.
- Prefer nice things and responsible journalism but require truth over feeling nice.
- Prefer original source.
- Content should stimulate discussion but no outrage porn, by extension no news on minor crime.
- Frogs can be posted on Wednesdays.
Subject to mod taste:
- No self promo of anything that can give monetary gain, other promo permissible within reason as long as it’s from an established user and hosted on an open network.
- No excessive trolling, no clowning.
- No low quality or low effort content. Memes allowed if original content of high quality. Applicable to posts more than comments.
- No vulgar content - no porn, no gore.
- Arbitrary bans will be awarded for making my life harder.
Moderation style:
- Mods are people. Mods will make mistakes and sometimes not own to it for some time.
- Mods are not responsible for the way you browse this community, I assume everyone read the rules before engaging.
- Mods sleep. Content not being taken fast enough doesn’t mean it’s permitted. Might leave stuff up not to stop people from discussing.
- Hope to lead by an example rather than with force. Can’t say if this is not an aspirational speech yet.
- I’m rather ill and have no succession plan. If you want to join in you’re welcome but I can be a bit of a tyrant.
Bias disclaimer:
- I was trigger happy on Reddit. This should be more lax but some things can still merit outright ban without warning.
- I’m mostly concerned with economic violence rather than culture wars. This will affect things subject to mod taste but not the general rules.
- I’m a member of Razem, a left wing political party. This will not affect taste decisions but please hold me accountable where this party affiliation specifically made me biased. This community is not intended to be affiliated with Razem.
- I refrained from modding not to end up on !yepowertrippingbastards but now I intend to because this community is going to be curated according to the rules above. Cheers.
founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
I disagree, we don't have to sacrifice social benefits and public service to divert all the money to the defense. We can tax the rich fairly and get both, a welfare state with strong public service and social security, and a strong army for our defense!
Neo-liberals are using the current situation as a new justification for the same shitty policies they are pushing for 3 decades. No change in strategy, just a new excuse.
No disagreement here, though I'd say the image is probably not meant to be taken literally. After all, if it's originally about the US, it doesn't seem to factor in how much more funding actually goes to healthcare over the military. Basically, thinking of this idea:
We can tax the rich fairly and get both, a welfare state with strong public service and social security, and a strong army for our defense!
In practice, I think there will always be disagreements on where government spending can be best used, which is an argument that exists and will continue to exist regardless of how much extra revenue a country is able to obtain via changes in tax policy.
Increase taxes on the rich and get more money on principle, because the rich should be paying their fair share regardless, but someone will always make the point that the extra revenue could still be better used by social programs over defense.
It's hard to put into numbers exactly how expensive it is for a government to prevent an existential crisis like the EU is currently seeing, but at this point they have a lot of catch-up to do after decades of assuming their American "allies" would continue to have their backs when needed.
perhaps they can grow their military while being wise enough to prevent a politically powerful military-industrial complex
I'm pretty sure 1953 was 72 years ago.
Nobody said it, I don't actually care it's just a compulsion.
What's up with the flies above the sword handle?
The stink of death and corruption attracts them?
Hands are dirty
Rearmament isn’t optional but you can serve all of the tables if you have a fair taxation. Military specifically should be funded from wealth rather than income, after all military protects wealth while regular Joe can click the computer at a company regardless of who’s in charge.
I thought that was the cops' job, military protects the working class as well.
while regular Joe can click the computer at a company regardless of who’s in charge.
Elaborate please.
There are people who work but don’t own things. There are those who own things but don’t work. In case of war those who own things lose due to destruction war causes. It’s in the interest of those who own things to finance their defence. Situation of those who don’t own things doesn’t change that much, they’ll pay rent to someone else.
In my experience the vast majority of the upper class are the least interested in defence. They just move their money and movable assets somewhere far away.
Situation of those who don’t own things doesn’t change that much, they’ll pay rent to someone else.
If there is anything left to rent. As you said, the destruction leaves very little untouched, and then they either have to move or stay homeless.
Progressive taxation is still the best move imo.
If there is anything left to rent. As you said, the destruction leaves very little untouched, and then they either have to move or stay homeless.
Which they were always at risk of and had to account for even without war. It’s not a binary thing of course though.
Progressive taxation is still the best move imo.
I’m for all kinds of taxes if that wasn’t evident enough :D
Just if we could actually pay for what we wanted
Don’t you love how conservative voters are pro or anti war, depending on what their overlords say?
I always thought that Europe learned her lesson after 2 world wars. But humanity is surprisingly stupid.
look how emaciated education is there with that cobweb on the globe at their table.