this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
320 points (92.8% liked)

From Europe or about Europe

141 readers
1 users here now

From Europe

or about Europe

Basics:

Etiquette

Content:

Subject to mod taste:

Moderation style:

Bias disclaimer:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure 1953 was 72 years ago.

Nobody said it, I don't actually care it's just a compulsion.

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What's up with the flies above the sword handle?

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The stink of death and corruption attracts them?

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Hands are dirty

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Rearmament isn’t optional but you can serve all of the tables if you have a fair taxation. Military specifically should be funded from wealth rather than income, after all military protects wealth while regular Joe can click the computer at a company regardless of who’s in charge.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I thought that was the cops' job, military protects the working class as well.

while regular Joe can click the computer at a company regardless of who’s in charge.

Elaborate please.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There are people who work but don’t own things. There are those who own things but don’t work. In case of war those who own things lose due to destruction war causes. It’s in the interest of those who own things to finance their defence. Situation of those who don’t own things doesn’t change that much, they’ll pay rent to someone else.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In my experience the vast majority of the upper class are the least interested in defence. They just move their money and movable assets somewhere far away.

Situation of those who don’t own things doesn’t change that much, they’ll pay rent to someone else.

If there is anything left to rent. As you said, the destruction leaves very little untouched, and then they either have to move or stay homeless.

Progressive taxation is still the best move imo.

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If there is anything left to rent. As you said, the destruction leaves very little untouched, and then they either have to move or stay homeless.

Which they were always at risk of and had to account for even without war. It’s not a binary thing of course though.

Progressive taxation is still the best move imo.

I’m for all kinds of taxes if that wasn’t evident enough :D

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Just if we could actually pay for what we wanted

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don’t you love how conservative voters are pro or anti war, depending on what their overlords say?

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I always thought that Europe learned her lesson after 2 world wars. But humanity is surprisingly stupid.

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

look how emaciated education is there with that cobweb on the globe at their table.