this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
12 points (62.5% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8837 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't get me wrong: I certainly don't wish for corporations to destroy the environment for their own benefit, but primarily because I believe that if the environment is to be exploited for industry the rewards of that should be shared equitably amongst the workers in a worker-owner cooperative structure, and the spoils of it should be shared equitably across mankind, and not only those alive today, but also those in the future, hence we need sustainability.

Insofar as actually wanting to preserve it for its own sake though - I think it's meaningless, in a vacuum I would in fact prefer less biodiversity, especially when it comes to insects, and I would really like it if we could exterminate all species of fungi, mosses, lichen as well.

Where others see untouched ecosystems I see unused land that could be a nice city.

I'm an anarchist but I am firmly anti-degrowth, I would genuinely side with neolibs against anprims because they made a far better world even for all it's flaws. Doesn't help that neolibs have actual arguments and all anprims have is the "noble savage" and "appeal to nature" fallacies. Superficially I'm more on the side of soviet tech optimism if that makes sense.

Beyond the political, I don't really have any affinity for it, there are people who say various nonsense like "green spaces improve our mental health" whereas I find them mostly depressing and kind of out of place.

I am okay with parks in cities as long as they're empty and within reach of civilization, but green spaces like parks in cities aren't nature, they're a well curated almost entirely artificial human creation, an expressionist pastiche of green.

Actual nature is wildfires, cancer, floods, earthquakes, predation, parasitism, prions, wasps, itching, pain, burning, poisons, toxins, spores, fungi, spores, lichen, moss, mosquitoes, wasps, bacteria, sun overly bright, needing to pee, being itchy, negative emotions, reptiles, spiders, no amenities, dirt, dirty water (swamps), viruses, bacteria, thorns, stinging nettles, mites, ticks, lyssavirus, people turning to religion etc.

Flowers smell okay, but really air freshener smells better.

I find it all absolutely disgusting, and what's even more disgusting is that these things can affect my unfortunate meat flesh prison, it could make me sick with some COVID-over9000 - another of mother nature's little treats, and then ruin my plans for the day, or even my life.

Nature is pain and agony, and when it's not trying to kill you, it'll damn well do it's best to make you uncomfortable 24/7, it makes me long for the eternal sanctity of steel in lieu of flesh, and the safety of concrete paved city roads lit under a warm orange glow of an artificial street lights. Some nice brutalist architecture, flat colours, sharp geometric shapes - urban and industrial environments feel like home.

As long as there isn't crowds though - people are nature too and pretty disgusting as well, they are as irrational as any frightened animal and a vector for disease.

I never understood what the big deal was with staying inside during the pandemic. It's one thing if you have a shit place and you have to house share or live with parents, if you rent a semi-modern apartment for yourself, I don't see the issue. As long as you're comfortable and have plenty of space, what else is there? All the things one could want are on the internet anyway.

I much prefer the internet tbh, here I have control, if there's something I don't like, I don't have to ever see it again, but I can also engage with it freely without the interaction ever escaping my control, my agency is never impeded. The digital space is much more liberating.

Outside I can't really use an adblocker, or a waspblocker, or a sporeblocker, or a people-blocker.

I've read a number of posts like this on Reddit before and to get ahead of the usual replies:

You have allergies!

No. I don't have any as far as I know.

You just need to do shrooms

I have several times, though I kinda hated it, I much prefer acid myself, and it didn't change my opinion in the slightest. Best place to trip is at home, I can't imagine the panic attack I'd have tripping outside. Actually I can because I have. Would not do that again. At least it was in a business district and not in some ugly forest so I could duck into a Starbucks.

You hate animals

No, I've actually had pets. That said while I value the companionship I would prefer an artificial companion instead.

You just need to spend more time in nature

I've already spent way more time in nature than I'd ever want.

You should read about nature more

Yeah I have. I actually quite like reading about ancient creatures and whatnot, especially from the Cambrian period.

You're just born after 2000!

Idk how that one is relevant but I'm from 1998.

But you're part of nature

Yeah, I hate that. The bits about myself that I love are all that I managed in spite of it, not because of it. I will hate growing old as my meat prison rots and breaks down and I will hate having to confront mortality knowing there is so much to do.

You just haven't visited [x]

I've visited the French Alps as a kid and it smelled like pig shit and made me exhausted, I've visited farms and it smelled like horseshit and was dirty, I've visited Times Square and it was the happiest memory I had as a kid. As an adult I've visited all up and down the UK and Russia (the Baikal and Ural) and idk about the nature there, it's all just whatever and blends in.

At one time a field in the UK offered me peace when I needed it due to material struggles and I enjoyed it, (despite the unfortunate fact it was a reminder of wealth inequality because it was all privately owned by some aristocrat) or at least I thought I enjoyed it, now that I fixed it by improving my material circumstances and have no need for it.

EDIT: Because people cannot read, I've highlighted that I do not in fact think we should destroy mosses and lichen etc. and I am in fact aware that destroying any natural ecosystems has has serious negative cascading effects on everything else including human life and I do not wish for it because I'm not a moron

That's why I said "in a vacuum", as in -isolated from other factors. I'm glad this post has encouraged discussion but please just actually read it before engaging. The lack of reading comprehension on Lemmy is genuinely worrying.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hate this opinion so I've upvoted you.

But I don't know, from my unaccredited armchair sounds like control issues and agoraphobia.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I thought agoraphobia might be the case and it would make sense as I'm a minority and trusted polls show most of the nation wants my rights gone, but I don't actually have any issues going outside and I don't fear people, I don't have issues even going out in nature, I just don't like the latter same as I don't like Chinese or Indian food, I will eat it if it's all that's available but I won't enjoy it.

My mental health is actually pretty perfect these days.

Not everything is some mental illness, people just have different opinions and mine is well reasoned I'd like to think.

On the other hand "loving nature" is something I seldom see justified in any meaningful way, so I remain unconvinced that it is something to consider.

Do you have any logical reasons for why you disagree (and "hate") my opinion?

[–] werty@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also prefer indoor plumbing and the absence of insects and I think nature is a bit of a horror show. What I find odd is your repeated assertion that

My mental health is actually pretty perfect these days.

That's a really unpopular opinion and one I cannot relate to in the slightest. How does it feel?

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It feels great. I have a girlfriend I met off dating apps right before enshittification took full force in OKC, while we have our problems, we do our best and we communicate (the most important thing). I have many friends, some of which go back to my childhood, others are new, just wish I had more time to see them.

I got a job I like (albeit lots of changes atm as my manager and cherished colleague of many years is leaving), and it pays OK, well above median wage in the UK at least, I work from home so I save time and money on commuting and I can interact as little or as much with coworkers as I actually want.

My ADHD meds are working well and I'm able to look after myself and perform tasks more or less on time when I need to do them. I had bottom surgery and discovered I'm pretty much free of gender dysphoria - an ever-present mental anguish I suffered prior. I've been through a lot, always uncertain future - I was on the edge of being deported for many years, but at least I have a permanent residence now, so I cherish the good things. Used to be flat broke, now got a bit of money, so when my gaming PC broke it didn't even phase me, I always knew it as a luxury to not be using an ancient laptop.

When my parents found out I was trans, they disowned me, but as I was an only child and it was their dream, they still paid for my university overseas. I hated them for a long time because I was very much limited by what they would allow me to do, but now that I'm safely independent, as an adult I'm eternally grateful for the opportunities and love they gave me, even if I felt betrayed then and there, I've been doing my best to reach out and slowly get back in touch again, even if they're not exactly trans-positive as one might expect of ex-soviet citizens, they're not brainwashed Z vatniks, so there's hope yet, and I do love them, and have many olive branches, they keep slapping away, and I will keep extending them.

I have many hobbies ranging from music production to electronics (like just simple circuits with Arduino type stuff), learning guitar and on to self-hosting stuff, I've even released some music on Spotify for fun, I read a lot about the world in my spare time from philosophy to history to economics to stratigraphy.

For the last few months I lived somewhat rurally in a shitty downstairs apartment that actually used to be great but it had a lot of issues not least of which extremely loud, extremely shitty neighbours, that made me feel down for a long time but I actually managed to move, took spending my savings on paying double rent for both flats at once but I moved into a nice spacious new build apartment building with good sound proofing in what the brits call a "new town", it's a nice city, very modern, much cycle infrastructure so I think I'll take that up when I have money, and it's population density is quite low in the centre so I really enjoy it, feels like a whole city just for me haha, and it's never crowded at all so thank god!

It's not that I don't have problems, but none of them feel unsolvable as they once did, many times I often feel like I can do anything! Maybe even own a house one day!

Sorry, it's all over the place, but I didn't just want to say "feels great! Thanks sucker!" But actually explain why I'm great these days so that maybe someone somewhere finds some value in it.

I may come off as a sardonic asshole in my OP, and it is what I intended, but as the world is going to hell and I feel powerless to change it, I want nothing more than for people to find peace and happiness.

[–] werty@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You write very well, and i encourage you to write more in the peace and happiness vein. I found your original.post interesting and amusing in the sardonic way but this comment is far more inspiring. I turned my life around once, immediately went the wrong way and now i'm trapped in my sofa again. I'm glad it's working out for you and i encourage you to share that. It's a great reminder of what is possible and people need that when the world is going to hell.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Thank you! I hope for the best for you. I hope you can turn it all around again and make your past self proud!

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whenever someone asks if I have a "logical" reason to disagree, it usually means according to their logic. Hate is logical. Disliking nature is logical. Liking nature is logical. Thinking a love of nature needs to be justified to you, on your terms, is not logical, so I'm not touching that one.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is no "their" logic or "my" logic, not all opinions are equal and not all are valid - there is only actual logic, the system according to which things either make sense or are nonsense. That's the system I would like people to use when justifying their viewpoints.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Uh huh.

No one is above biases and contradictory beliefs. However, even contradictory beliefs can individually be logical because logic is not the same thing as truth, and truth is relative.

Saying that I "hate" your opinion, but upvoted you, was acknowledging that it was, in fact, Unpopular. Not an invitation to go into whatever internet edgelord argument you're trying here. Because I've read your beliefs, many of which are contradictory, and you apparently can't take a joke - I don't think any argument would be in good faith.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't know what to make of this word vomit attempting to make some kind of broad societal statement that you still cared enough to share with the world despite it making no points of any use to anyone.

"Everything is relative" is the philosophy of a child who thinks they know everything. Grow up and form some actual beliefs and realize that yes there is such a thing as truth and yes there is such a thing as objectivity and yes there's a reason why some opinions are justified and others aren't. Realize that truth is the basis of science and technology that keeps you alive today.

Sure, people might be all irrational, but there are certainly degrees to irrationality, we might be susceptible to biases or contradictory beliefs, but not all equally so, and it doesn't make all beliefs inherently contradictory or irrational unless proven to be so, which you have failed to demonstrate.

That's why some people can be absolutely right, and others can be absolutely wrong, and that can be objective. Go study the scientific method, epistemology, etc. Learn about actual formal logic, propositions, fallacies and so on, teach yourself how to think correctly and do reconsider your anti-intellectualism.

Why are you even here at all, if any slight and gentle attempt at a discussion on a discussion subreddit is "an internet edgelord debate" you're being "baited" into that definitely won't be in good faith?

Like, bruh, you opened the app??? What did you expect???

And I would certainly be happy to take your joke had I noticed you making any.

EDIT: Also, blocked. I don't need this childish truth denialism and anti-intellectualism in my inbox in the morning, it genuinely rustles my jimmies. It's like the number one reason the whole world has gone to the dogs.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So mentally healthy, you say.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I never understood what the big deal was with staying inside during the pandemic. It's one thing if you have a shit place and you have to house share or live with parents, if you rent a semi-modern apartment for yourself, I don't see the issue. As long as you're comfortable and have plenty of space, what else is there?

I agree with this part, yet:

Flowers smell okay, but really air freshener smells better.

No.

I've visited the French Alps as a kid and it smelled like pig shit

Definitely not.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Idk, flowers are just weak air freshener honestly. It's not surprising that something that was created to smell good to us smells better to us than something that wasn't meant to smell good at all.

Definitely not.

Guess we approached from different sides. Where we descended there was smell from a nearby pig farm. Almost swore off animal products then and there just because animals get pretty gross ngl.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
Progress,” he said finally, “is like a herd of pigs. That’s how you should look at progress, that’s how you should judge it. Like a herd of pigs trotting around a farmyard. Numerous benefits derive from the fact of that herd’s existence. There’s pork knuckle. There’s sausage, there’s fatback, there are trotters in aspic. In a word, there are benefits! There’s no point turning your nose up at the shit everywhere.

Andrzej Sapkowski, The Lady of the Lake (The Witcher #7)

[–] bigboismith@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I'll never understand why people downvote unpopular opinions on unpopular opinions. While being bonkers it's written well

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 8 points 10 months ago

That's the spirit, lad! You found the perfect community.

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I’ve actually had pets. That said while I value the companionship I would prefer an artificial companion instead.

I think this says everything that needs to be said about the position this opinion is coming from.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does it? What's the position? Ultimately my reason for posting this is to create a discussion so I'm curious to hear what you think.

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I find it all absolutely disgusting, and what’s even more disgusting is that these things can affect my unfortunate meat flesh prison

Nature is pain and agony

I’ve visited the French Alps as a kid and it smelled like pig shit

I much prefer the internet tbh, here I have control

These statements are all super dysfunctional, imo. You seem to be trying to hide from the realities of the world.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Idk I'm not hiding from anything? Like i can't really hide from these so-called realities, I just mitigate them as do we all by living in and perpetuating civilization by e.g. not littering thereby not fly-tipping and not attracting flies and other infestations.

What's exactly "dysfunctional" about these statements? How can a statement even be "dysfunctional"?

[–] SamuraiBeandog@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your reactions are very exaggerated, overly emotional and not actually grounded in reality. The French Alps don't actually smell like pig shit.

I much prefer the internet tbh, here I have control, if there’s something I don’t like, I don’t have to ever see it again, but I can also engage with it freely without the interaction ever escaping my control

You type this but then say that you're not hiding from anything? I'm sure psych textbooks could give you a name for this. Do you really not see a difference between "I don't litter to avoid attracting flies" and "I don't want to interact with any situations that I can't completely control"?

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

Exaggerated? Sure. It's the internet, it's how we write, but even the very title is prefaced with a "kinda".

I have absolutely no emotional involvement in this whatsoever, this is a pass time for me on the toilet. I really don't care either way.

The key is "I don't want" as in - not my preference, I still do nonetheless.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would really like it if we could exterminate all species of fungi, mosses, lichen as well.

Congrats - you just destroyed yeasts and useful molds (both are fungi).

Now we don't have bread and most alcoholic beverages, skin is lacking natural protection, and yes - no more blue cheese.

In seriousness, this kind of opinion shows lack of understanding as to why those ecosystems are preserved in the first place. Not only are they directly responsible for producing things like oxygen, they prevent a lot of natural disasters (drought, cataclysmic hurricanes, land erosion, etc), and are able to naturally replenish their own resources, unlike agricultural land that either needs influx of matter from natural ecosystems, or requires finite resources extracted from Earth (for example, apatite).

As much as we think of ourselves as the conquerors of nature, in the long run we still cannot exist without it. We didn't figure it out.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago

That's why I said "in a vacuum" - as in, isolated from other factors including consequences. I do not in fact wish for ecosystems to be destroyed as I'm not an idiot.

I appreciate your input, but please just read the post before wasting time writing this out next time. Thank you.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You probably have some sort of sociopathic leanings, which you aren’t acting on (this is good) A severe disconnect from valuing other lives. This is a type of neurodivergence I think. I’m the kind of person who will risk getting stung by a wasp that’s found her way in my home rather than take a life, so I’m the other extreme perhaps.

I think learning about ecology would be the most “helpful” route for you. I think a lot about the beauty of finding 13+ ant species in a square meter - what that indicates about complex intertwining systems of life, and how beautiful that is. There’s an enthralling relationship between a certain type of tree in Africa and ants that leads to the ants protecting the tree, while the tree creates a place for the ants to live… the more you learn the more you realize how complicated this is, and how humans can never possibly understand this enough to intervene without fucking things up.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

in a vacuum

This is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here. In essence, you're saying that it would be better if all our material problems didn't exist. "Yeah, these are essential processes, but it would be better if we didn't need them, and so we wouldn't have their problems. Who wants problems?" This is nearly a truism.

Besides that, what's rest is that you abhor the aesthetics of nature in favor of that of the industrial. That's also reasonable but not anything we can discuss.

PS: No idea why these comments are so hostile. I see a ton of people ardently defending nature aesthetics and flaming industrial aesthetics for some reason. Also please don't take in what they say about you.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is doing a lot of the heavy lifting here. In essence, you're saying that it would be better if all our material problems didn't exist. "Yeah, these are essential processes, but it would be better if we didn't need them, and so we wouldn't have their problems. Who wants problems?" This is nearly a truism.

Oh yeah it's doing heavy lifting for sure but the intention is different.

It's more like: "yeah environmental damage is bad but if we could solve that, there's really no downsides"

Generally it seems a lot of people on Lemmy I encounter (not you though) seem to struggle to think along those lines of a hypothetical, and it doesn't help that I don't think I convey it that well.

And yeah thanks for pointing out how hostile the people are, it really is toxic AF here.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's also pretty much an aesthetics thing. I don't see how any aesthetic could have a downside over another. For example, being caught in a machine can come with the industrial aesthetic as well.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean it's not entirely objective for sure but you're being reductivist.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 9 months ago

Reduction is gain. —my 10th grade teacher telling us how to chemistry

[–] Gecko4469@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I like nature but see it in both ways. It can be creepy and scary and gross. But I don’t know, mostly I guess it’s the variety of visual stimuli and noises that I like. It’s all just so neat, the shapes of plants, shiny hummingbirds, how big it all is, moody fog in trees, finding a weird bug or plant you’ve never seen in your life, seeing things that are explicitly not made by humans, I find it comforting. Human made stuff is cool but also if that was all there was I think it would be pretty depressing, it’s nice that things exist outside of our making.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Good points! I agree tbh.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Have you read Caves of Steel?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

The Isaac Asimov novel? That was very much a product of its time.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did you have a traumatic experience in nature as a child?

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No. I can't say I've had any "trauma" at all. I grew up in a safe and stable home to loving parents. Nowadays I have a pretty good life and my mental health is pretty perfect, thanks for asking

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I do not understand how you have gone through life without any traumatic experiences, that seems incredibly unlikely. Also, you are perhaps the only person on earth with perfect mental health these days.
I was thinking you had maybe had a bad experience in nature when you were young because your comment reminded me of a few people I've known. At least one of them had a series of bad camping experiences as a child that really defined how they view nature for the rest of their life. I think they had a parent who was really into nature and tried to force it onto them but it didn't go well.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

No you misunderstood, I have had many traumatic experiences, I just have no trauma. Everything has been solved, processed or otherwise just didn't leave a lasting impact.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 10 months ago

I like the cut of your gib, but what courage it must've taken to side with neolibs in anything on Lemmy.

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You should Google Murray bookchin

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know Bookchin and I've skimmed some of his works, though I'm more familiar with Kropotkin and Graber, what's your point?

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

What point is there in hating the only thing you owe your existence to? I view it as a kind of ideological laziness, an unwillingness to accept that which come before you and will be after you. An insufferance of compromise with the forces of nature. It stresses you out and you feel like you caj'tcdo anything about it, and that usually turns into extractive, oppressive thought. I think your problems lie elsewhere, and nature is your scapegoat.

You refer to your body as a meat flesh prison but that's an incredibly shallow way of perceiving the greatest vessel for existence that we know of. An incredibile marvel of evolutionary engineering, an organic machine abile to develop memories, happiness, pain, instinct and conscience. It is the way for the Cosmos to know itself. It's typical human hubris to dismiss it as "flesh prison" while actually it's the vehicle of our freedom.

I'm just a random on the internet so i don't pretendente i am right abt you, another random on the internet, but i just don't think it's an healthy outlook and you should challenge it

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the only thing you owe your existence to?

That out of the gate is an incorrect assumption. I owe my existence to nature to some degree for sure, but also to a significant degree - technology. An even larger part of why that existence is tolerable is exclusively technology. Were it not for science, medicine and again - technology, I wouldn't be glad I even exist at all.

view it as a kind of ideological laziness, an unwillingness to accept that which come before you and will be after you

I don't see how I don't accept it? Besides I would argue it's the opposite that is "ideological laziness", we as human beings are defined by our defiance of nature, we evolved brains so we could outsmart it and build our own environments so we could be better off.

Of course that doesn't mean humans are that awesome either, we escaped the wolves only to create new wolves just to throw people to them. There's probably an actually good argument there about evolution creating a cruel sort of balance, but nonetheless - a balance, and perhaps civilization is just a trick for the worst of us to gain the most power, and a monopoly on power is a monopoly on violence - a truly unnatural concept, and then they could impose the kinds of suffering on others that'd make one long for nature's cold dispassionate cruelty.

But to worship nature as something to preserve simply unto itself and not out of factors for how it would impact human beings, or at least not consider it a canvas for us is a bit lazy when our very existence is defined by molding it to our preferred shape and image for ourselves.

An insufferance of compromise with the forces of nature.

Which is what led to y'know - civilization?

stresses you out and you feel like you caj'tcdo anything about it,

Huh? I've never said anything of the sort. This is just an idea that's been bouncing around my head. I don't actually feel strongly about this at all. Plus I can and do do things about it lol as do we all every day.

and that usually turns into extractive, oppressive thought.

I'm sorry to hear that but I can't say I've ever experienced anything of the sort.

think your problems lie elsewhere, and nature is your scapegoat.

I don't have any problems at all really, this is just a discussion, and sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

You refer to your body as a meat flesh prison but that's an incredibly shallow way of perceiving the greatest vessel for existence that we know of.

Eh, it's become okay after some modifications to fix nature's fuck ups, but ofc I'm not downplaying the various interesting complexities and their evolutionary journey throughout time of the human body, it's complex stuff, and we don't even know it all yet. But that also doesn't mean there aren't issues with them either that could be fixed, they are in fact already being fixed everyday.

It is the way for the Cosmos to know itself. It's typical human hubris to dismiss it as "flesh prison" while actually it's the vehicle of our freedom.

Eh, I think that is hubris. I'm not sure the cosmos desires to know itself, and I think our meat bodies are prisons we will one day escape in better, more well suited shells just like we did with our environment.

In many ways, we already do cheat death and agony daily thanks to man-made wonders and that's just directly, ignoring the decreased risk we have from the start thanks to our civilizations and whatnot.

I love my body - but I would not do so without the man-made components that make it whole, before that, existence was pain, so I'm not so sure about this "marvel of engineering", seems more like something interesting that was bound to happen given geological time scales, like a donut shaped cloud, or something.

I'm just a random on the internet so i don't pretendente i am right abt you, another random on the internet, but i just don't think it's an healthy outlook and you should challenge it

I don't think there's anything unhealthy about it but yes, clearly I am willing to challenge it because I wouldn't make a post if I didn't want to hear any counterarguments.

Maybe this is weird but given solid enough reasons it would be intellectually dishonest for me to maintain the same views even if someone roasted me while at it, in fact in many ways my current beliefs were forged through the fire of debate in that vein.

I constantly challenge myself in this way, to if not change my own mind, at least sharpen my own viewpoints and make them specific and get to the core of things and understand my ideas and myself better. I steelman even the worst of takes just to see where I stand.

Sadly the quality of arguments made this far ITT has been absolutely terrible, yours being probably one of the best ones so far in that you at least seem coherent unlike the other people who either cannot read, are responding to a strawman in their head instead of what was written and/or complain about having to engage with an unpopular opinion on /c/UnpopularOpinions or resort to truly psychotic levels of intellectual laziness by responding with ad-hominem sometimes followed by some variation of "that's just like, your opinion man".

The only thing I've really learned is that debate classes, critical thinking including critiques of ideas in art and literature and basic civics should be fucking mandatory in school alongside reading or else democracy can't survive the onslaught of an electorate of retards.

[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 1 points 8 months ago

What i meant by owing our existence to it is that the natural world is everything, literally, it doesn’t matter if we modify it, for we are natural too, and so is our behavior. Maybe owe is the wrong word, it’s not my intention to force some religious-adjacent message to this. Technology is nature elaborated by consciousness, which is natural too, unless you assume an outside influence. That connection is why I think it can ultimately be unhealthy to feel this way, it’s a negativity that one way or the other can be reflected in the end product.

Let me be clear, I don’t think your viewpoint is invalid, nor wrong. I am no one to tell you what to do or think. I am just sharing how I perceive it, and why.

I don’t think we are being defiant of nature, for it is our nature to be defiant. It’s a contradiction, a superposition of intention, that I think is mirrored in many contradictions of the fundamental rules of the Cosmos. Evolution is made from mutation, and memetic mutation is the latest and fastest expression of Life, or rather, Existence. Now I am putting some “religious” undertones. It’s my way to reach spirituality through scientific notions. I am not an academic and I don’t pretend I can get an objective view, just a spiritually healthy one (spirit = mind = soul, to me)

Unwillingness to compromise with the forces of nature is not what led to civilization. Humans went a long way before they could have the means to ignore certain limitations the world imposed on them. And now the earth under those means is crumbling, and the assumption that technology is separate or “better” than nature is falling apart.

I did not wish to assume you acted like those responsible for these failings, but I do want to caution you against that ontological perspective. I think there’s value in it, and risk too, as there is in mine.

I agree in a sense that bodies are prisons. Probabilistic cages that help us manifest from the singularity. All matter composing you and me existed way before it was you and me, but that matter could not think or feel or argue or suffer or smile before they coalesced in their current form.

That is why we are the Cosmos knowing itself. Not because it “wants” to but because we are it and are experiencing it. I am glad you have this disposition towards discussion and your own viewpoints, I appreciate that way of thinking and I try to do the same

I have not read the other replies, but consider that you might be biased by your viewpoint to see them as less coherent than they are, as viewpoints do. We humans struggle to see how much of our thought is lost in translation when it’s passed into word.

All of that said, in the grand scheme of things it's a false dichotomy to distinguish between "natural" and "unnatural", but I appreciate the Mechanicus angle nonetheless, though I do not share it anymore.

p.s. I cannot imagine having an LSD trip in a Starbucks and NOT have a panic attack, the only trip where i haven't felt any anxiety was the first one, with close friends in the middle of a grove in front of a small lake. The other better ones where at home, though, but I do live in a very green place