I think you're kind of missing the point of OSS. Github could completely fall off the face of the earth tomorrow and nothing bad happens. There are dozens of other platforms to facilitate the development of software online. Github is not the end all be all and in the grand scheme is only a small player.
Open Source
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
Yes, but actually, no. For a ton of projects, Github is an important resource. It is the main collaboration tool through the issue trackers, offers hosting and continuous integration. If it fell of the earth today, a lot of projects would scramble and have a lot of lost (meta)data.
If they were to announce that they would shut down in three months time, those same projects would scramble as well to migrate - which is also a bit chaotic, but less so.
And: many projects are switching away right now. I moved mapcomplete to a selfhosted forgejo instance since a few months ('cause I don't trust github no more), Organic Maps moved just now cause they got a (temporary) ban. One of their contributors was apperantly from a US-sanctioned country (more info about them here: https://en.osm.town/@[email protected]).
Github is an important resource.
And there's dozens and dozens of replacements available. The issue you're speaking of isn't an issue with Github at all. It's an issue with developers.
If Github going off the map borks your development because PROGRAMMERS can't use anything but Github, you have much bigger problems than you think.
How do I discover your code if it is on a selfhosted repo? On GitHub I can just search for keywords and find interesting projects.
The same way you do any other project. If you're interested, you go looking. You find my project which has a link to the repo. A link is a link. You're simply fighting over where the link goes to, and I'm pointing out that it's a stupid argument to be had.
I think Github is a relatively simple issue. There isn't really a shortage of european (or just selfhostable) alternatives, and the way git works means that most contributors have complete local copies of the codebase. TBH I worry more about the ability of american contributors to continue working on a project if the code is hosted in europe - basically a lot of open source developer teams could end up being split or shut down entirely. And the bigger projects like Linux and a lot of the intermediate layers between the Linux kernel and applications are majorly backed and developed by american companies and their employees.
the Linux kernel and its applications are majorly backed and developed by american companies and their employers.
And this is the problem, considering that Linux has been written by Linus Torvalds, a European. The base and the majority of developers should have remained in Europe, but unfortunately a mistake has been done.
Most key stuff is not on GitHub or GitHub is just a mirror. The heir apparent to Linux is Hartman and he moved to Europe a long time ago.
No mobile devices are safe. Those are all proprietary black boxes for hardware. If the shit hits the fan, it is back to dumb phones and x86 computers. Digital doomsday prepers are not sounding all that crazy right now IMO.
I have gotten weird interactions with rate limiting through GitHub because I will not whitelist their stalkerware collector server. They also pushed 2 factor to stalk and exploit through the only documented path they wanted people to take. I quit because of it.
Hm, that makes me think I should really go ahead and set up my own git-frontend, or at least check out all my git repos.