All of them were innocent, since none had trials
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
87 points (100.0% liked)
Actually Infuriating
539 readers
137 users here now
Community Rules:
Be Civil
Please treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.
Content should be actually infuriating
Politics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.
Mark NSFW/NSFL posts
Please mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.
Keep it Legal and Moral
No promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.
Partner Communities
- Mildly Infuriating
- Furiously Infuriating
- Memes
- Political Memes
- Lemmy Shitpost
- Not The Onion
- You Should Know
- Lemmy Be Wholesome
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
This is a braindead take. The man wasn't sent to El Salvador for having an autism awareness tattoo. He was sent there because he wasn't white. He just happens to have an autism awareness tattoo.
It's like saying a Japanese American in WW2 was rounded up because he was wearing a hat. Or that a black man was lynched during segregation because he knew how to whistle.
It just misses the mark so much and completely ignores the real reason. Ask yourself, if this man didn't have any tattoos, would he still have been sent to El Salvador? If the answer is yes, then the tattoo literally doesn't matter.