this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
59 points (95.4% liked)

Energie

218 readers
2 users here now

Community für Austausch zum Thema Energie.

Verwandte Communities:

Netiquette wird vorausgesetzt. Gepflegt wird ein respektvoller Umgang - ohne Hass, Hetze, Diskriminierung.

Bitte beachtet die Regeln von Feddit.org.

Attribution


founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archiv

Kurzfassung: Sie erreichen etwa 12,3%

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Could these also possibly appear as less than transparent to birds, given the UV absorption?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago
[–] NIB@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I dont understand all these "we should put solar panels in x". Sure, we could but that would be less efficient than using proper conventional solar panels. It isnt as if we dont have enough land area for solar panels, that is not the bottleneck, there is plenty of land.

We had those stupid solar roads, now this. I dont understand. At least transparent solar panels might have some niche uses.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think the idea here is vertical space > horizontal space.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At some point they could become cheap enough that it's less about absolutely optimal efficiency and more of a "might as well" thing.

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, maybe. I definitely think this is more useful than solar roads.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s also an aesthetic thing. In addition to that some houses don’t have enough land or roof space for panels but do for windows. This opens up a lot of possibilities, especially in cities

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're forgetting about transmission. That's one of the biggest hurdles towards a solar future. Putting the generation right next to where the power is used is much more efficient both in transmission, infrastructure and maintenance.

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually had written a sentence about solar panels being closer to where the power consumption is, as an advantage. But that also implies that you are localizing other parts too, things like batteries. Which is feasible but it complicates things.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not necessarily, you can hook them right up to the grid.

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly this - there is enough land around where you can build solar. Put it over your parking spaces. Every solar farm is better than a corn field. Use those big industrial roofs. There is enough space

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

12,3% is recht gut. Die flächen wo das eingesetzt werden könnte sind ja komplett ungenutzt bisher, also is alles über 0% ein fortschritt. Kosten technisch ist halt die frage wie lange es braucht bis sich die dinger rentieren.

[–] Obelix@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Die Flächen sind natürlich nicht wirklich ungenutzt, die Sonneneinstrahlung durch Fenster ist ein wichtiger Teil der Energiebilanz von Gebäuden.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Someone told me abou this five years ago. Maybe in another 20 it'll happen.