this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

DRM

309 readers
1 users here now

A community for the discussion of topics surrounding DRM, Digital Rights Management.

All media that DRM can be applied on can be discussed here, for example books, movies, music or games.

Digital rights management (DRM) is the management of legal access to digital content. Various tools or technological protection measures, such as access control technologies, can restrict the use of proprietary hardware and copyrighted works. DRM technologies govern the use, modification and distribution of copyrighted works (e.g. software, multimedia content) and of systems that enforce these policies within devices. DRM technologies include licensing agreements and encryption.

Wikipedia

Guides and useful tools

Quick and dirty way to rip an eBook from Android

2025 Guide for freeing books from Amazon (after D&T was removed)

Guide to Removing DRM From Amazon Kindle E-Books

Liberate your Kindle books before leaving Amazon (Tutorial)

How to setup Calibre to remove DRM from ebooks on Linux/Archive mirror

Guide on removing DRM from Kobo & Kindle eBooks (reddit mirror, Archive link)

Extracting content from an LCP "protected" ePub

DeDRM tools for eBooks: a plugin for Calibre for removing Adobe DRM, Obok etc.

Calibre eBook Management

Miscellaneous links

DRM - Frequently Asked Questions by DefectiveByDesign

Guide to DRM-Free Living by DefectiveByDesign

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This isn't a debate about the legality of the matter, but on whether it's ethical to DeDRM ebooks that you've checked out from a library. The publishing company and author are usually paid for each copy that you've lent, which is often why eBooks exhaust large parts of a library's budget. If you are able to loan a book for a month, but you DeDRM it and don't share it anyone else, and therefore instead finish it in two months, is this ethical? Or have you intentionally reduced the potential for more revenue to the author by instead not lending it twice? Do the publishers predatory licensing fees for libraries make this more ethical?

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Do the publishers predatory licensing fees for libraries make this more ethical?

Yes. Fuck the publishers for trying to close down libraries with extortionate fees.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't De-DRM borrowed ebooks as I don't own them (I borrow the book I don't buy it, it's a renting contract between myself and the library and the publisher, I want to respect it). I do remove DRM from books I purchased because like with a printed book I expect to fully own what I purchase. At least I did so, since I quit entirely purchasing DRMed ebooks. If I need more time to read a borrowed ebook, I can add extra time to my renting of it.

My opinion is that by not respecting the contract we do no harm to the publishers but we put the very existence of ebook rental at risk, maybe even of public libraries.

[–] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting argument! While I have no qualms DeDRMing bought books, I do feel a bit more bad about trying to DeDRM lent books.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I said (maybe failed to make it clear?): I play by the rules and don't De-DRM rented books ;)

[–] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, sorry, I got your point and I'm leaning towards your side of the argument. I think I was the one being unclear.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think of it like this: if I had perfect memory of everything I've ever read, would that be DRM infringement?

No? So DRM on books is inherently ableist, right?

[–] Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't give them any ideas. With Neuralink they'll enforce DRM on our memories.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I might literally prefer death over getting one of those chips

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You may one day, you or your children, not have a choice.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's always a choice, and for my money the most important one is deciding to believe it is so.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s always a choice,

Really? Lucky for you then. There are plenty things II must do whether I like them or not. And things happening to me whether I want them to or not.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did not say we get to choose what our options are, only that there are always options to be chosen.

I believe that the first thing evil men must do to make us do evil is to convince us we have no choice.

But you do. And those choices are who you will have been, when it's all over.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Honestly, the author isn’t getting that money. Publishers are using pricing schemes that are intentionally meant to punish libraries. Do two wrongs make a right? Idk. But there is a strong case for anti-capitalism and the freedom to read should be the highest ethical concern.