this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
159 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

5196 readers
153 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

In my opinion, we really need decentralized, self-hosted infrastructure.

I kind of hope we get a Fediverse alternative for WhatsApp.

I imagine running some kind of relay node on a raspberry pi, for perhaps 20-100 acquaintances. All traffic would be anonymized and encrypted as much as possible. Push notifications replaced by polling. Anonymous broadcast groups that allow anonymous sending and receiving of messages without revealing either who is sending or who is receiving.

Everything wiped every few minutes on the relay node.

Others would also run relays that are then federated together.

[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

ActivityPub isn't good for everything, especially for privacy. Luckily SimpleX exists.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, never heard of SimpleX, but I will check it out.

But to make an analogy. Bitcoin wasn't good for privacy at first. But they added features and new coins like Monero were developed with strong privacy.

So I expect there will eventually be a private ActivityPub, either "on top of" or "next to" the current one.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

i mean sure, you can modify the standard enough until it's somewhat secure, but it doesn't make any sense to do so.

You actively don't want secure communication channels to be interoperable with insecure ones, they should be kept as separate as possible so there's minimal risk of leaking the important data.

[–] absentrevision@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

How would simplex even help here? Is the a Lemmy alternative built upon simplex? Or a friendica one?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

not sure how this is confusing, simplex is a chat app with privacy as the #1 priority; OP wanted a private alternative to whatsapp, simplex is that alternative.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago

I missed the thing about the chat app 😅 My bad.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

SimpleX can be self hosted

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It doesn’t cover everything you’re referring to, but there are projects like

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Scuttlebutt

So there is certainly a way forward for what you’re describing

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 10 months ago