this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
655 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

20165 readers
1814 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

>Puts Iron-56 in a box.
>checks at the heat death if the universe
>still Iron-56
>mfw box also Iron-56

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you don’t look in side 2 billion years later, it’s both U-235 and lead-207!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Schrödinger’s radioactive decay may or may not have killed his cat.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The lump would still have about 14% uranium still in it. (If my understanding of half-life is correct)

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Afaik its always going to have some parts of uranium right? 50% after one half life, 25% after two half lives and it will keep on halving practically forever (or till the last atom decays). In the end it comes down to when you consider it a negligible amount.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

after a certain point, you're going to get to where you have to split an atom or two.

fairly sure that'd be far less exciting than normal.

Edit: i decided to try and figure out how long that would take.. and per usual the law of large numbers caused my eyes to glaze over.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

half life times log2(amount of atoms), right?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean I didn’t get that far, I lost track of how many zeroes were in the half-life.

(It’s 704ish million, right?)

[–] JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago

I mean, yes, that's how it would work if there were an infinite number of atoms in the piece. There's a finite amount, though, so eventually there will be a point when all the atoms have completely decayed.

All models are wrong, but some are useful.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, thats what I was using to get 14%.

2billion years is about 2.8 halflives, so I calculated (1/2)^2.8 ~ 0.14.

[–] kehet@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Damn greedy corporations and their shrinkflation

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn bro, how many times has this happened to you

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Enough to post the meme

[–] Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you put a cat into the box with the uranium and wait the same amount of time, that cat will be dead. this is true. no questions. thank you.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Unless the uranium in the box caused a mutation in the cat giving it eternal life.

[–] geomela@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So is Lead-207 special lead, or is it just, like, lead?

[–] FreeBeard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

The normal lead we know but still special. Is the last stable element in the PSE and there is the theory that it's actually radioactive (unstable) but the decay is so slow that we probably never see a single atom of it decaying.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Schrödinger’s Nucleides.