this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
223 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42137 readers
177 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 44 points 11 months ago

53.7percentsofar.jpg

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 11 months ago

Those are rookie numbers. Let's go further.

[–] KbSez@piefed.social 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If I was a stockholder I would be suing the board for mismanagement--- we all know what the solution would be: get ride of #Musk.

From what I understand Musk and Larry Ellison are no longer the largest stock holders so for them not to get rid of him from management and the board is pure breech of fiduciary duty to the stockholders

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

It is merely back to pre-election levels. However it does look like it will keep declining.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Even before all of this, with that pay package. WTAF?

Apparently there's quite the revolt brewing for their AGM. They probably can't remove him before hand, because they need to turf the board here as well. It's been a long time since we've seen something like this, arguably if even ever? It's happened with lots of companies in the past, but not with one this high profile. At least that I can think of.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And it's still way overvalued. Market cap greater than Toyota? Good one

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

It can drop another 90% from here easily. Toyota's in better shape as a company these days.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is TSLA overvalued? To be generous, let's compare them to just NASDAQ stocks:

  • AAPL - $209 - 0.48% annual dividend
  • MSFT - $378 - 0.88%
  • NVDA - $115 - 0.04% 🚩
  • AMZN - $193 - 0.00% 🚩
  • GOOG - $164 - 0.49%
  • TSLA - $240 - 0.00% 🚩
  • SpaceX - not traded
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Um, try with P/E. Stock price is meaningless.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Meaningful part are the dividend ratios.

The problem with P/E is that, while it's great to measure business health internally, a company that has great earnings and then decides to "invest in growth" instead of paying dividends, is just a Ponzi scheme as far as investors are concerned: no expectation of returns from the company, only from the hype among other investors.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some companies give dividends, some don't. It's a difference in strategy, and I think more of a young company vs old company thing. I don't find it particularly meaningful. If you are growing quickly, it makes more sense to use your financing to finance more growth. If you're not, makes more sense to attract investors with a healthy dividend.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago

A company that can't offer a ROI to its stockholders, is a startup that should never be allowed to go public; stick to angel and venture investors instead. Public stocks relying on the hype of "growing quickly", are a Ponzi scheme through and through.

If we speak of company ages, the argument doesn't hold either:

  • AAPL - 49yr - 0.48%
  • MSFT - 50yr - 0.88%
  • NVDA - 32yr - 0.04%
  • AMZN - 31yr - 0.00%
  • GOOG - 27yr - 0.49%
  • TSLA - 22yr - 0.00%
  • SpaceX - 23yr - not traded

A good chunk of the US market is made up of Ponzi scheme companies. With 401k-s tied to market investments, people are setting themselves up for a very rough awakening.

[–] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

click here to pre-order my upcoming book, published by Harvard Business Review, "Don't Be A Fucking Nazi and Other Secrets To Corporate Success"

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When your Lemmy client shows you previews of the links...

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

I forgot not all clients do this and thought it was an anti-joke or something for a honest second.

[–] Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i just had a moment of clarity - there's absolutely nothing stopping me from linking goatse instead of rickrolls on lemmy, the internet can finally heal.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 11 months ago

Sounds like you’ve achieved goatse post-nut clarity.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 13 points 11 months ago
[–] GrumpyBike1020@monero.town 12 points 11 months ago
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 11 points 11 months ago

That drop largely just cancels out the numbers since November. If it drops further then it indicates a general souring if market opnion.