this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
1071 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

7731 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 119 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Fun facts!

85% of people arrested with fentanyl at the border as U.S. citizens.

The vast majority of people arrested here for trafficking children are U.S. citizens (and children are over 3x more likely to be trafficked by an acquaintance or relative than they are a random kidnapper).

"Illegal aliens" commit less crime than natural born U.S. citizens.

Violent immigrants, perverted trans people, and incompetent DEI hires are all moral panics. You hear so much about them because the Republican party has nothing to offer that will make your life safer or easier.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Shut the border down to all Americans until they can control their criminals. They arent sending their best.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

They've made a business out of selling panic and fear to the masses. Betraying their own people for money. Never trust a conservative politician or business person.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also the "tremendous amounts" of fentanyl coming in from Canada last year came to about 250 lbs.

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i'm not sure if you meant the number to be interpreted literally, but isn't 250lbs of fentanyl a lot. both psychonautwiki and substancesearch state that a "heavy" dose, which is where you start to seriously risk overdosing, (regardless of method of administration) is around 100ug. some quick back of the napkin math:

  • 250 lbs ≈ 1.1*10^11 ug
  • 1.1*10^11 ug/(100 ug/dose)=1.1 billion heavy doses
  • 1.1 billion doses/365 days≈3 million, i.e. assuming you take a heavy dose every single day if the year (which, again, will likely kill you), 250 lbs would be able to supply 3 million people for a whole year

of course, this is assuming 100% purity, so these numbers probably change quite substantially if "fentanyl" is actually defined as "substance containing fentanyl"

of course none of this is with the goal of defending whatever the fuck trump is doing, i just wanted to put into perspective that 250 lbs can actually be quite a lot for super potent substances like fentanyl

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Did this stupid mother fucker really refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as "governor"? Can't tell if pushing the 51st state bullshit or he's just that fucking dumb!

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He thinks speaking diminutively to people automatically puts him in a position of power over them

It's an insecurity issue common with bullying

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He has been for a while now, which is actually a violation of the US' nato obligations. But who care anymore, the US is no longer an ally.

Edit: it also violates a ton of border treaties, and half a doze international agreements the US has benefited from for a long time. But just with NATO:

Key points of the treaty

  • The parties agree to settle disputes peacefully
  • The parties agree to refrain from using force in a way that goes against the United Nations' goals
  • The parties agree to consider an attack on one of them as an attack on all of them
  • The parties agree to consult about threats and defense matters
  • The parties agree to safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their peoples
  • The parties agree to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area

Threatening Canada violates all of these and then some.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trudeau should call him Mayor, or even better, "Convicted Rapist and Felon".

[–] null@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's more subtle. He's been calling him just "Donald".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Both, he honestly believes that he will take Canada and Trudeau will be demoted to a governor somehow.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Canada at least has a "Governor-General" who is appointed by the British monarch.

Edit: like several other commonwealth states, Canada is a completely separate country from the United Kingdom. It just happens, by law, that King Charles III is the king of all of them.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When talking about what Charles III is doing in relation to Canada in his position a king, we're supposed to refer to him as the monarch of Canada, we just don't tend to do it because he doesn't live here full time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] papertowels@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

It's the new "we'll build a wall, and mexico will pay for it" - a clause so dumb that people will complain about that, unknowingly tugging "normalcy" a step in that direction.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All drugs should be legal and regulated.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Decriminalised use/possession, for sure.

But I always think the libertarian "just legalise all the drugs" is just odd.

Regulated? So you mean preventing people from taking really stupid shit? Sounds great sign me up lol

People gotta accept there are trade-offs to living in a society, and one of those is that there's a limit to which we allow each other to get high. Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a "war on drugs" style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

You wanna take shit like meth? Cool, go out to the woods and never use socialised medicine where workers are at risk from people on such drugs, or just randoms walking down the street.

I don't think taking hard drugs should put you in prison, or even give you a criminal record, but actually legalising the distribution? Nah. Go live in the woods/hills away from everyone else.

[–] s23b@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a "war on drugs" style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

The first such drug that comes to my mind is alcohol. Its distribution was also criminalized in the past, eventually leading to an increase in organized crime.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (24 children)

holy shit I can't believe I'm agreeing with a .ml user about something

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not all .ml are the same 😇

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

True, but none of them can say bitch

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

..pardoned..Ross Ulbricht..

Good. He should have been free the whole time.

https://reason.com/2018/07/25/ross-ulbrichts-murder-for-hire-charges-d/

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Yea, there are so many other guys, that he pardoned, which are way worse..

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A broken clock is right twice a day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I love that out minister Joly flat out told CNN, and I'm paraphrasing, "if we are being honest America is a net exporter of immigrants and drugs to Canada. Don't lie and say this is about drugs or immigrants it isn't. It's about destroying the Canadian economy so you can annex us for everything that makes us one of the most desired countries in the world to live."

Seriously fuck America

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Pardoning Ulbricht is the incredibly thin silver lining of Trump's presidency. These drug war advocates talk like they really believe this problem can be solved with criminal justice, meanwhile they defund harm reduction education and make healthcare inaccessible. It's diabolical.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's always been nothing but smoke and mirrors with Trump

The thing he cares about is making you think he cares

The grift is always his focus

[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

my assumption is that he wants a guy like that to assist in the operations of a new american run private cartel network, after they have ousted mexican cartels who cant be reasoned with to give up their profits to the US Oligarchs and private contract groups. they get a chance to install their own american run mexican cartel in mexico, and take over their drug trade for private funding operations. it would explain the 3000 troops they sent to the southern boarder, among other "official" reason.

this guy will help them with connecting with private sellers, to private clients, and logistics. im also assuming that this "new silk road" will be heavily monitored under the guise of decentralization and privacy, for use in things like blackmail, and coercion of users. or simply to attack other drug trade networks by undermining their image and pricing.

but what do i know? im just some guy in a bathtub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I also want to point out that when whites are addicts, they go after the dealers. When blacks are addicted, they go after the users

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If any of these worthless politicians actually gave a shit about drug abuse, they would end prohibition and offer basic social services.

Never gonna happen regardless of the politician's brand.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

All research and successful drug policy shows that treatment should be increased and law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iiinnnn@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Pardoning him was however a good thing, given price gouging regarding medications

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Evidence was tainted/fabricated by a crooked cop and Ulbricht was never convicted of it.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well, that's not quite what happened. There is evidence he ordered the hit and paid for it. The tainted cop tricked Ulbricht into thinking that the killing took place.

Source:
Page 19 under heading "2. Murders Commissioned by Dread Pirate Roberts"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Shit, Ross is a mfing hero in my eyes. Fuck prohibition.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

To be clear, he doesn't care about illegals either, except as a talking point to get Murcans fired up.

https://www.newsweek.com/immigrant-deportations-removals-trump-biden-obama-compared-chart-2026835

load more comments