this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
311 points (99.4% liked)

News

28477 readers
4374 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mass firings at the IRS under the Trump administration threaten ongoing audits of wealthy individuals and corporations, potentially leading to millions in lost tax revenue.

The cuts primarily impacted employees in the Large Business & International Division, many of whom had extensive tax expertise.

With fewer agents and specialists, complex cases may be prematurely closed, undermining enforcement against high-end tax evasion.

Critics warn this weakens IRS oversight and emboldens tax avoidance among the ultrawealthy.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 107 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Gee, that almost sounds like it was intentional.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not even subtle about it any more.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 23 points 1 month ago

They weren't subtle to begin with.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The only thing that’s incorrect about this article is that they talk about millions in lost revenue, when the effect will certainly be in the billion if not trillion dollar range.

[–] CritFail@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

They should have cut all IRS investigations except the wealthy.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 54 points 1 month ago

For every dollar spent on IRS audits for middle America, they get about a dollar back in recovered revenue. For every dollar spent on auditing wealthy Americans, they get about twelve dollars back in recovered revenue. I don't think these cuts are intended to help balance the budget.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would they do exactly the opposite of their goal?

[–] CritFail@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I may be behind, have they installed a Republican shill in directorship in the IRS as well as defunding them? If not, then they should still have agency in fund allocation

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The rest of us are mostly automated. Checking your return against a W2 and a couple of bank 1099s is easy.

Chasing down tax dodging through a web of pass through entities is not.

[–] CritFail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fair point, but potential returns are massive, and if they were targeting likely evaders , they could compound the money spent on manual checks (a list of high ranking Republican members might be a good place to start)

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That kind of seems like the opposite of efficiency

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 38 points 1 month ago

Almost like efficiency was never the point.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 14 points 1 month ago

Makes it more efficient for the wealthy when finding ways to avoid paying tax.

[–] PearOfDees69@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

we the poor are not a fucking bank for these lazy bastards that just keep taking all our shit for their own personal financial gain.. And they'll keep taking and taking if we keep letting them, and we've been over the limit for some time already It's past due to push them off of us

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 23 points 1 month ago

And yet, Republicans have been steadily making gains with the working class. With this past election they are now the dominant party for working class voters. It comes down to two things. American voters are deeply ignorant and the Democratic party is pathetically weak and out of touch.

[–] aaron@infosec.pub 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

That's some good praxis

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Geez gosh golly!

I can't believe stuff like this happening under a Trump presidency ! Is it actually possible Trump wants good things to happen to the wealthy and nobody else!

Not possible! I refuse to believe it!

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

Clearly, it was Hunter Biden's intern's emails about a tan suit.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Helmsley Doctrine (“only the little people pay taxes”) is now law

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Trickle up economics

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I refiled my W4s to pay little to no taxes. I realize they're going to come after it later, but I just plan to play dumb and delay and deny for as long as I can (without facing jail time).

[–] credo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Retail Store CEO:

We will save money by firing all the cashiers!

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sue Trump and Elon for the illegal firing now before it is too late.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That'll get you literally nowhere. Someone with deep pockets would be the only option to sue em, even then, they'll just counter sue for defamation and drown you in legal fees

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Friendly reminder that Joe Biden increased resources to the IRS and they recouped billions from wealthy tax cheats.

But he was too old, so we went with an old rapist felon traitor instead.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Surprised Pikachu Face...

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It doesn't make sense to me because there are fewer ultra wealthy people in America than there are poor people.
so with staff getting cut in half, you'd think it would be better to focus on the smaller group.

[–] Master@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Turns out they only have enough to audit the poor and middle class.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't they retaliate by specifically prioritizing the wealthy?

If they're crunched on time wouldn't they focus on the highest value accounts?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

TLDR: They are prioritizing the wealthy. They simply can't afford to audit them without staff and funds to do so. They only audit if doing so is profitable for the government.


They did. They have been targeting the wealthy for years. It has been all over the news.

Problem is, court cases are expensive, running audits are more expensive based on the scale of the assets involved.

The IRS always makes additional money back based on every dollar of funding given to them but Republicans always defund the IRS. Here is an article about it from the end of the last Trump Admin LINK HERE

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Fucken sick of this blatant manipulation by the wealthy. The IRS is our fucken money maker.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I would say "why don't they just focus on rich people and not audit the other 90% of Americans." But we already know the answer to that one no matter who's in charge.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

This is what you voted for protest non voters! Congratulations!

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago