this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
189 points (98.5% liked)

Linux Gaming

17567 readers
163 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Original Command and Conquer, Red Alert, Generals, and Renegade have all been released under GPL licensing to the public.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is an awesome news. Now OpenRA will improve a lot more.

Though I still like this joke:

Why EA is the worst gaming company in United States? Because Ubisoft is in France.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Lol, gottem

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Freeing old game software is better that never doing it, so that's worthy of praise. I hope this becomes a trend that other companies try to one-up each other on.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll hold out on praise until they open source Red Alert 3.

Because then the game itself will have escaped to the one place that isn't corrupted by capitalism.

[–] Sparhawk87@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 month ago

SPACE!!!!!!!

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Damn... Thats actually pretty cool.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Someone mentioned in another post about this that compiling the source of one of these still requires you to own the game on Steam to run it and I'm just like "if it's open source, couldn't I just, like ... Remove the code that enforces that?"

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Usually when code dumps like these happen they don't include any of the art assets. That's why you still need to get the game on steam to run it, to download the sprites and what not. Has nothing to do with the code enforcing anything.

I don't know about these particular releases though, I could be wrong.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah that actually makes sense. Open source of the code doesn't give you free reign on the art assets. Wouldn't have even thought of that myself.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

when a game is open sourced its almost universally just the code, and not the art assets.

This is only speculation on my part, but I assume it has something to do with the headache of the art assets being used in media/advertising/etc and trying to detangle.

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago
[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is one evil ass company. I think, although it sounds... pessimistic... this is Virtue signalling.

Either they did something pretty evil recently, that is even more evil than their normal evil, or they are about to.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Let me start by saying that I agree that it’s a company that’s out there to make profit by any means and that they’ve been a huge pile of shite.

But this isn’t virtue signalling.

Virtue signalling by definition means preaching something you don’t practice.

They didn’t only say they’re open sourcing it, they actually did.

They might be doing it to try and “buy” some goodwill from the general populous, that’s possible, but they at least did something tangible to that end.

Would’ve been cool if they released the assets too in addition to the code but I recon there might be reasons why that was not possible.