Short answer: No. Garbage in, garbage out. CSI-style zoom-enhance is pure fiction.
There are AI tools that will hallucinate more pixels, if that's what you want, but that's just plausible lies based on prior data.
c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.
Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.
THE RULES
This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.
All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...
This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.
All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.
One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.
If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.
Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)
Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)
The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.
Short answer: No. Garbage in, garbage out. CSI-style zoom-enhance is pure fiction.
There are AI tools that will hallucinate more pixels, if that's what you want, but that's just plausible lies based on prior data.
That is exactly what I want - I know the original info is lost. I did try using Night Cafe's creative upscale, but it was too creative even on the lowest setting - adding whole new details to the picture that weren't even hinted at.
If you're using a non-phone camera, I don't think there's any upsides to using digital zoom. Just take the photo full res (and raw if you can) and then do the cropping/zooming in gimp, etc. Then you have full control of the cropping, and you might even be able to use a better upscaling algorithm than the camera's built in.
This is not true on phones because when you zoom in digitally the phone does something called super-resolution imaging where it takes a whole sequence of photos and then stacks them to try and fill in the missing information. That tech hasn't caught up to dedicated cameras yet.
What camera are you using?
You can do super resolution in post if you take multiple photos of a still subject. They do this in astrophotography.
👍 That's an idea..
That is all great info - about how cell phone cameras have better goodies these days.
I have a Canon EOS R50 with the kit lens (RF-S18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM) I also inherited my dad's Canon Digital Rebel with whatever lenses he had.
You will never get those pixels back. They are gone. You can, however, create new pixels. They won't be as good as the originals, but in some cases, they'll be good enough. An open source AI/ML interpolation tool I have used with decent results is called Upscayl. There are AppImages, Flatpaks, and many Linux packages available to download.
I also found this: https://www.anyrec.io/image-upscaler/
It looks like it did a good job The windmill was less than 1/4 of the whole image.
And it seems to be free - but it will only handle a picture that is 300x300 px.
P.S. Here is the original image:
Sounds exactly what I want. Thanks I will check it out.
It seems Upscayl is cloud based, and as such has an ongoing cost.. (Like everything today: Don't sell the steak, sell the sizzle) What comes in these Appimages, Flatpacks and other packages you mentioned?
The cloud version is paid, but the desktop versions are free and available on the downloads page. Or you can build it from source.
An example: along Highway 20 going west from Williams - one may see a single mountain in the coastal range that has snow. I took several pictures starting near Williams, but as we were just starting to get close enough, the closer mountains started to block the objective mountain.
So I have some pictures with a tiny mountain, and some when I used the e-zoom and have a more frame-filling mountain, but at a lower resolution.
And Yes, I am aware that CSI-Enhance is a fantasy used to uncover evidence in a tv show. AI-hallucinated pixels are fine with me for this, as long as the hallucinated pixels look plausible, and are not entirely made up details.