this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
311 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31539 readers
2194 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 99 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As the hyenas pick at the corpse of the once proud United States, they occasionally snap at each other.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago

"A hyenas belly is never full"- hyena from LK

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago

I heard David Attenborough reading this comment in my head.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well... At least watching the robber barons rip each other apart may be mildly entertaining. It's like the WWF goes to Capitol Hill.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The problem is that one of them will end up on top at the end still.

I hope Musk drops out though. Because with the e-mail he sent to all the FBI employees he is making some serious enemies right now. The moment he loses protection, he will be thoroughly investigated and I can't wait to see the long list of things that will be uncovered.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

that's a good point. Musk has pissed everyone in the government off. I imagine that many of those sympathetic to Musk in the regulatory and law enforcement agencies don't appreciate the ways in which he's inserted himself in this conflagration and his immensely heavy handed approaches.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

US military contractors get away with genocide. He won’t be Investigated as long as Tesla or SpaceX holds contracts.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lockheed, Boeing, and NG are way more ingrained than Space X and would love to clear away a competitor. And they have no morals and will happily strike during a moment of weakness. Should at least be entertaining as the country collapses.

lol wow, I can’t believe I’m actually rooting for Boeing to pull this again with Musk. Absolutely wild.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

He will just tell his pet trump to tell them to back off

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

Not really comparable since the whole US government is complicit.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Them fighting each other also give them less time to do horrible things. Yes, they will still do some bad things while they fight, but it takes up some of their time and hurts their sense of unity. It reduces the damage a bit. It also inspires other outside the government to fight back too

Every little bit of delay and harm reduction is something we're going to need

EDIT: also worth mentioning that now other agencies are also pushing against musk now that Patel is. Resistance is often something that spreads once it is normalized

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't imagine this is a legal way to get rid of federal employees. Hell, I doubt this is a legal way to get rid of ANY employees.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Since when do the orange utan and his goons care about legality?

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Orange utan is not only a new one(to me), it is the best one.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I prefer the portmanteau, Fantascist, as it mixes the two and also suggests fantasist.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I have been calling him The Orange Fart, cause that’s what a trump is in British, but I prefer yours.

[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mango Mussolini is one of the originals I still love

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

This one sounds like it could be another flavour from the Leninade guys

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least Patel is an actual thing. Who is this Musk person inside the government? Apparently no one.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

An unelected Nazi loser. Congress would love to demand questions of him but republicans are blocking that. For now...

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Either that or he's preparing to spring something even worse on them. Such as: "Don't bother explaining what you do and just pack your things."

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 years ago

Multiple agencies are now also doing the same thing. I find it unlikely this was planned by DOGE as it is massively embarrassing to Musk and makes him look weak

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 years ago

Either that or he's preparing to spring something even worse on them.

[–] ThiefUserPermissions@lemmy.myserv.one 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For someone who is not a gamer, he has managed speedrunning becoming the biggest douche in history

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

If not physically, then DEFINITELY in spirit.