this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
56 points (81.8% liked)

News

36000 readers
2707 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Obelix@feddit.org 110 points 1 year ago (23 children)

Which is kind of crazy, if you think about it: The federal budget is coming from taxes. So the deal is that Trump is destroying valuable services of federal institutions and only 20% of the "savings" are getting passed on? While normal people will have to pay for stuff like the weather forecast?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Another 20% would go towards paying the federal debt. Ok, but that still leaves out 60%.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where’s the other 80% going? It’s our tax dollars.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 16 points 1 year ago

Into the pockets of the billionaires.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago

Not any more.. Now it's tax Rubbles, Riyal,and Crypto.

[–] BaldProphet@piefed.social 39 points 1 year ago

DOGE would have to actually save money for this to work.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Anybody who believes that he would actually do this is someone who would fall for the wallet inspector.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I look forward to three extra dollars in my pocket per year. I'll buy an egg.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

May I offer you 3/5 of an egg in these trying times?

[–] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 3 points 1 year ago

Remeber how roads are very important for our shitty infrastructure? Anyway, we don't fix them anymore here is enogh money for a down payment for a carton of eggs.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Specifically, the American citizens who are part of the Trump administration.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, so the ones who would typically be vehemently against any sort of 'government handout'.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's your price? Do. Not. Cave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Spend money on taxes to maintain important departments.

The government guts important departments and programs.

Gives just 20% of your taxes back.

Profit?

[–] Netrunner@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is called a bribe. He doesn't want to give any money out but he realizes that firing hundreds of thousands off people and robbing the government clean isn't exactly a slam dunk policy, so instead he's offering you as 2,500$ check to watch this happen.

Sick shit, really.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The initial claim of Musk was that Doge saves $2 trillion... That would be ~$1.2k per citizen.

But honestly I'd be surprised if that figure isn't closer to $100 billion "saved", which would net each american a <$60 cheque. And all of that money goes towards paying higher egg prices.

Edit: changed the numbers to reflect Trump's claim.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the independent calculations are correct, DOGE has cut $8 billion in government spending. 20% of that, divided amongst 350 million Americans, would be $4.57. If DOGE's claims are correct (and they're not), they cut $55 billion, which would be $31.43. Even if DOGE met it's goal of $2 trillion, that would be $1,142.86, which would be a significant one time payment for a lot of Americans, but wouldn't offset the loss of Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, a functioning Post Office, etc.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And a massive 100% of the "negative savings" (ie damages).

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

20% of 0 is still 0, Donny-boy.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And the other 80% to himself and his friends.

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

probably to one particular American citizen

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't that cause inflation? Something you were campaigning to reduce?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Haha. No way. Profit go up

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And he and Elon keep the rest?

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

in other words, it's a stimulus check, a thing that he can put his name on to prevent (and completely fail in doing so) the economic recession that would be caused by his stupid policies making the price of everything go up.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

ok, yeah, sure. whatever you say, jan.

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would love to see that. It's based on lies and we could see how much. Really how much.

load more comments
view more: next ›