this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
483 points (99.4% liked)

News

35724 readers
2826 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

On February 16, 2025, Washington state Judge Lauren King issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Trump's January 28 executive order that restricts transgender care for minors.

The judge ruled the order unconstitutional for overstepping presidential authority under separation of powers and violating the Equal Protection Clause.

The injunction follows lawsuits by Democratic attorneys general from Washington, Oregon, and Minnesota and temporary blocks in Baltimore.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 113 points 1 year ago (4 children)

These judges are working too slow, but that's the point of these processes.

But it's not like it's going to stop these right wing maniacs in USA to do anything different

[–] frezik@midwest.social 85 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So far, the legal system is the only part of government doing any substantial pushback at all.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, don't count on that alone. At best, it's insufficient, and that would be without a Supreme Court run by batshit morons.

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it's only a matter of time before judges start falling out of windows. That's the next step.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

“Presidential act” “not illegal”

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Not quite... Remember when the legal system found Trump guilty of 34 felonies?

Yeah, he was not punished.

[–] SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah they’ve sent a few strongly worded letters.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Government is a lumbering giant.

Every president has failed to implement their vision. That's the point.

What's going on right now is unprecedented, but Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

It's just going to fuck up our standing in the world of geopolitics, which will have long lasting consequences.

I hope I'm right, because I sincerely doubt it goes any better than that.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

It's just going to fuck up our standing in the world of geopolitics

It already has.

Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

I hope you're correct, but we can't rely on that.

Individuals have to also take action, and keep pressure on the people who are supposed to be preventing these abuses.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's going on right now is unprecedented, but Im still of the belief that our safety nets are gonna catch this one.

The Republicans will look at what they have done and institute broad limitations on executive power on their way out the door (assuming we don't just end up with martial law). This will prevent Democrats from ever attempting anything even remotely similar. But there is always the ever-so-slight chance that it nerfs Republicans down the road too.

Maybe.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That assumes they still have the house and senate in 2028. If they're going to do that they'll do it before the midterms. Their majorities in both houses are razer thin, and the incumbent party almost always loses ground in the midterms. Trump wont allow them to hamstring them for his final two years in office

[–] MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

There are no safety nets and guard rails anymore. It will be raining judges out the windows soon and that's your sign that it's totally over.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

ImPeAcH tEh JuDgEs 4 TrEaSoN !!!
--maga

The legal system never gets you your remedy when you need it. It's slow.

[–] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump is such a moron, and this is what the American people voted for. It's also going to affect the rest of the world.

Absolute insanity.

[–] MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I don't think the American people voted for this. I think Elon paid to have the election hacked.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless the judge is literally beating him with a book titled "Legal Setback" in a fatal manner, her efforts aren't going to do shit. Legal action against a man who's above the law is like spitting on a fish.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

the constitution? republicans just threw that out the moment they had control

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why cling to the 2nd amendmend of the constitution and not make use of the means?

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Highlights by me.
Instructions unclear?

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doing that means throwing everything away. Even if someone survives after starting a firefight, chances are they'll get caught and imprisoned for life. It takes a lot of courage and commitment to do something on that degree, I find it understandable why people are a little hesitant.

That said, Luigi did it. So can we.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Sadly it's a prime example for the paradox of tolerance and sooner or later people will act accordingly.

[–] root_beer@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that has crossed the minds of a lot of people in the last several months, mine included

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm a very peace loving person, but I understand that having peace is only possible if all involved parties keep peace; only one party or some parties keeping peace while others wage war is in the end no peace at all.

[–] fediverse_fremont@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

i never trusted the legal system anyway the only difference between a corrupt judge and a good one is how they rule on your case anyway

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

preliminary

I knew this word would appear. Either that or “temporary”.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why does this matter? The entire executive branch has said they will ignore the courts and that the courts have no power over them, cause 😝. Unless someone IN the executive branch enforces anything, it’s all just hot air blowing in the wind.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Mais le roi, c'est moi!