this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
185 points (95.6% liked)

World News

35662 readers
5 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Global Times, a major Chinese propaganda tabloid,

The Daily Mail, 🤣

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 12 points 1 year ago

Pots and kettles eh 🤣

[–] radon12445@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Why use the word "claim" for something that's painfully and obviously true? 🤔

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Context: global times is not a "newspaper". It's Chinese nationalist English media. Their proper state run media is much more formal and reserved. For example look at Xinhua.

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

NGL, I had already learned of collapse and how cooked we were back then, but I thought it was exaggerated and that we had some time to go before things really started to pick up....

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

where's the lie

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Propaganda about the enemy usually doesn’t require altering the truth much. Propaganda about the own state of affairs is a completely different story.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's actually not true, with respect to altering the truth. Usually the quantity or quality of a single truth is heavily distorted, or outright fabricated. See Iraq's WMD that never matetialized.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Gotta think about this a little more I guess.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very frequently propaganda relies on a single kernal of truth, and then changing the quantity, quality, or both of said truth. All it needs is some level of justification, then it can be molded like clay into whatever you need it to say.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

When the audience/readership has no effective way of fact-checking what is said then they can (and do) just make it up to suit their narrative. Anything that contradicts the narrative is an "unreliable source."

https://swprs.org/the-propaganda-multiplier/