this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
185 points (95.6% liked)

World News

35662 readers
5 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 61 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Global Times, a major Chinese propaganda tabloid,

The Daily Mail, 🤣

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 12 points 10 months ago

Pots and kettles eh 🤣

[–] radon12445@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago

Why use the word "claim" for something that's painfully and obviously true? 🤔

[–] coolusername@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago

Context: global times is not a "newspaper". It's Chinese nationalist English media. Their proper state run media is much more formal and reserved. For example look at Xinhua.

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago

NGL, I had already learned of collapse and how cooked we were back then, but I thought it was exaggerated and that we had some time to go before things really started to pick up....

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

where's the lie

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Propaganda about the enemy usually doesn’t require altering the truth much. Propaganda about the own state of affairs is a completely different story.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's actually not true, with respect to altering the truth. Usually the quantity or quality of a single truth is heavily distorted, or outright fabricated. See Iraq's WMD that never matetialized.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Gotta think about this a little more I guess.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Very frequently propaganda relies on a single kernal of truth, and then changing the quantity, quality, or both of said truth. All it needs is some level of justification, then it can be molded like clay into whatever you need it to say.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

When the audience/readership has no effective way of fact-checking what is said then they can (and do) just make it up to suit their narrative. Anything that contradicts the narrative is an "unreliable source."

https://swprs.org/the-propaganda-multiplier/