this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
228 points (99.6% liked)

xkcd

10616 readers
238 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was great until my thumb slipped and I accidentally launched my telescope into the air at Mach 8.

https://explainxkcd.com/3047/

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

TIL, I can totally enrich uranium with a modified dental drill.

Well, I'm off to start a new project, I'll let everyone know how it goes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Isn't record 78rpm instead of 72rpm?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

It's probably a PAL record instead of NTSC.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

You'd think the WR would a lot higher...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

A lot of people won't notice the difference.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)

"Sidereal" pronounced /saɪˈdɪəriəl, sə-/ sy-DEER-ee-əl, sə-

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

meaning "of the stars" (from Latin, as opposed to Astral from the Greek)

used in modern English in "consider" (literally: with the stars, meaning to scrutinize the sky).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, that's sub + scribere: "write under", as in signature. No relation to sidereal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

What would the bird version of "consider" be?

Conavis?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get I never learned phonetics but how tf do you pronounce upside down e

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's the phonetic symbol for schwa, which is like a relaxed "uh" sound.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Oh it's so obvious now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Like ethereal

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

300 RPM for screwdriver ??? I guess it's electric/machine ones, because no one in gods green earth can turn regular screwdriver 300 RPM

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Stupid question… are these RPMs true??

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Everything in XKCD is based on truth. That's what makes it so funny... to geeks, at least.

Edit: God damn it, he put 72 instead of 78 RPM. I guess he does make mistakes after all...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He also put 33 instead of 33 and ⅓. Get the pitchforks!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just a random thought, I always knew that 33 multiplied by 3 is 99 and 33 1/3 multiplied by 3 is 100, but I never considered that 33 is 99% of 33 1/3.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I mean, technically, the record will play just fine. Everything will be slightly slower and lower pitched, but it'll work. Think doom metal meets 1930s jazz.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe I'm dense but shouldn't the clock be:

  • H: 0.01667
  • M: 1
  • S: 60

Yep, I'm a dumb, realized after a cup of coffee. Confirmed by the reply below.

I think I'm just going to go back to bed and skip today

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Yes, you're dense lol. The speeds are correct: the second hand that does one full Revolution Per Minute, the minute hand does one full Revolution Per Hour and the hour hand does one Revolution Per 12 Hours.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Oh my god I'm full of caffeine and still wondered this same thing. In my defense it's Friday afternoon and I'm tired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The sidereal telescope mount one seems to be right (approx 1 rotation per day).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wow, dental drills spin stupidly fast. I never realized they're jamming something in my mouth that makes a turbopump seem sluggish, and that makes the scariest laboratory centrifuge I've ever seen blush in shame.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Big centrifuges are quite scary. Think of how much mass they are moving at those speeds. In comparison, a small drillbit turbine being rotated by compressed air seems less scary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The scariest lab centrifuge i've personally seen went to something like 100k rpm, and 800,000 g. It's basically a cartoon safe with a piece of lab equipment inside, because when something fails at 800,000 times the force of gravity, it's going to end up outside the city borders, or inside the next building over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I occasionally run a lathe at work. The big CNC one says it will do 10,000 rpm

If you ever run it that fast, the jaws will start to separate and the part will come flying out at Mach 4, bounce around the inside of the machine for several minutes, destroying the chuck, all the tooling, and the chip conveyor in the process.

Another fun fact, these machines go from 5000 rpm (the fastest you're assuredly safe to run it) to 10 at the snap of a finger and back up again. All of that energy has to go somewhere. So there's a heat coil, pretty much identical to the one in your oven, that takes all that extra energy. It doesn't normally get all that hot, but if you're running a lot of parts with a lot of diameter changes, it can get hot enough to glow.