this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

196

18656 readers
93 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not about killing the king. The king can never be killed. It's about keeping him in check until he can't move anymore

[–] Formesse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's also worth noting the term is "capture". And outside of rare instance - you didn't really want to kill knights and the like: You captured them, and ransomed them back to their family/liege lord etc.

And there is a reason the term "Kings Ransom" exists. John the II of France for instance was captured, and Ransomed for something like 300000 gold coins of the day - something like 300 million or up to about 3 billion in today's dollars (conversion is a little fuzzy but to put it simply: A BLOODY TONNE OF MONEY).

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If chess were a new game released today, I imagine a lot of these "why'd they make it political" types would probably object to the fact that the most powerful character in the game is the only one that's clearly stated to be a woman.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Well, originally, the piece is Vizier - king's advisor, the gender of which isn't specified. (but implied to be male?)

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wokeness is why she's not in a bikini or hot. Look at this. ♕

End WOKENESS

/s

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If chess came out today, some mod author would give her huge badonkers

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Some mod authors have most definitely already done that. Only 250$ USD for a hand carved set on Etsy.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I could see myself owning this if I had the money

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sometimes I see a nude depiction and wonder to myself if it's artsy or pornographic. In this case she's fingering herself, so that answers that question

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's Botticelli's Venus doing with her hair?

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Probably not much, her hand is on her thigh. Though I guess it's possible that a goddess has articulated hair. If you zoom in on this chess piece her finger is clearly extended and going between her legs