nednobbins

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Weight is a pretty poor predictor of planning and effort.

The overwhelming evidence is that for some people it takes far more work to maintain a healthy weight than it does for others.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Physics tells us that CICO predicts weight gain and heaps of empirical data tells us it's one of many relevant factors.

Most people don't really control their weight by counting calories. They go by how they feel and our feelings,are heavily influenced by our biochemistry. Semaglutide doesn't work by giving people will power or self control; it works by targeting GLP-1 receptors to make them feel full sooner.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is absurd that we essentially have a regressive income tax. I also wouldn't ignore the global environment during that period.

During those decades, the US was effectively the only industrialized nation in the world. Everyone else either never had factories to begin with, or had smoldering piles of rubble where their factories used to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The major difference is that in "blink" and "chicken" you expect to keep doing your thing (eg driving straight ahead) while only your opponent makes concessions.

The Cuban missile crisis involved significant concessions on both sides.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The Cuban middle crisis was resolved through negotiation and concessions, not by a game of nuclear chicken.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed. They don’t necessarily vote for the better candidate, they vote for their favorite candidate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

They vote against their interests but not against their emotions. People hate her now, for good reason. The people voting for her then, clearly didn’t hate her.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

There are plenty of reasons to hate her but she was the longest serving UK PM ever. She couldn’t have been that hated if they kept re-electing her

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. The real debate is on which parts should be off limits.

Most people can think of some speech that they consider so horrible that nobody should be allowed to say it.

People often try to hedge that position by arguing that they're not even really infringing on anyone's speech because their form of restriction doesn't meet a sufficient threshold of censorship.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Does anyone?

The closest I can think of to “real free speech absolutists” is the old-school doctrinal libertarians. Even they have limits on what they believe should be allowed and specifically state that contracts should be legally enforceable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

As a joke, I once asked an LLM to produce a review of Top Gun that argued that it was actually a trans allegory. It made terrible arguments but it did produce words that technically met that requirement. (It included some kind of hilarious lines about the satirical use of hypermasculinity)

I imagine an argument that “Amerika is a love song” would look similar.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

Rammstein released “Amerika” in 2004. That was during the 1st Bush Jr administration but the complaints in the song aren’t limited to Republicans.

view more: next ›