Shit, we should also ban insta, fb, and google places while we’re at it.
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
647 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
77791 readers
2424 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Don't tempt me with a good time.
Actually, be very tempted please! Get 'm!
load more comments
(5 replies)
The reason we have a Chinese competitor that we cannot directly control is that Meta is buying up every promising US platform and shutting it down. Or just trying to copy it so that the competitor does not get enough users
As if anti-trust law doesn't exist. It is crazy to me nowadays, most tech startup's goal from the very start is to sale to a big tech competitor. This certainly should have anti-trust implications.
Nope. The legal system is pay to win.
load more comments
(5 replies)
So what does Zuck do when Trump uses an exec order to stay the ban and pushes Republicans to reverse it?
Algorithmically quell his own cybernetic rage.
It's already back up lmfao
Yep. But this doesn't answer their question. I'm rooting for a Tik Tok CEO vs Meta CEO battle Royale at the inauguration.
Trumps just gonna keep him hanging hoping he’s in the inner circle and bleeding him dry in the process.
If Zuck gives Trump more money then why would he? Probably would just allow Meta to buy it or something dumb like that.
load more comments
(9 replies)
Media headlines that use the word lobbying probably do it so that people don't take up arms. If they were to instead call it bribery, I think a lot more people would take issue with the whole process.
they can't really do that because that would be defamation and they would be sued for it. Bribery is a crime and while it is effectively the same as lobbying from our perspective, one is legal and one is not and a media outlet can't just accuse someone of a crime without evidence unless they want to close up shop
When in practice Corruption is not investigated or prosecuted, nobody ever gets convicted of Corruption, the Media can't talk about Corruption as it would otherwise be defamation, hence the country has no Corruption.
I haven't lived in the US but I lived in the UK and this was exactly how Britain had "no Corruption".
Except the only thing that will be prosecuted, or adjudicated, is the claim of libel entered by Meta, for suggesting their millions are anything other than legal contributions to something or other.
There is a solution, though, staring us all right in the face.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Well we knew it had to be something. I mean most of Congress is too old to know what a tik tok is.
They’re just too old for everything. They’re almost part of ancient history.
Tic Tac Toe!
Headlines that basically say the same shit twice really are swell.
If you want to produce the same shit twice, just use a colon.
“lobbing”
is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha
I think this was less about lobbying and more about bogeyman of China.
“Issues related to voter suppression/interference, political ads and misinformation policies.”
It's nice to see meta have learned from their own mistakes and are now trying to protect ~~democracy~~ profits.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal
I don't know why I do this to myself, but I read through Meta's disclosure
Every single lobbyist I looked at worked in DC before becoming a lobbyist. I knew it happened a lot, but it's really depressing to see
Also, why do these disclosures not require companies to specify how the money was spent? There are only ~20 different lobbyists mentioned, and Meta spent 7.6M in a single quarter
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is why we gotta ban TikTok!!!!! \s
$7.6 million, pocket change to these chumps. Up the ante!
view more: next ›