this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
199 points (99.5% liked)

News

37090 readers
2482 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson stated Sunday that the U.S. will enforce the TikTok ban unless ByteDance sells the app to a U.S.-based owner, countering Trump’s suggestion of a 90-day extension.

Johnson emphasized TikTok’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its harmful influence on American users. GOP Senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts also opposed an extension.

The law does not allow the president to grant an extension without guarantees that ByteDance is actively pursuing a sale.

Johnson added there is no evidence of progress toward such progress.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Burn it to the fucking ground. They only want it to make it into another GOP propaganda tool.

Propaganda, so hot these days.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nobody believes that this will be the issue that the GOP breaks from Dear Leader. Trump will extort both sides for the best deal for him personally, and Johnson will let him.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Ah, but if Johnson rallies votes behind him, he can negotiate the return of Tik Tok for personal gain, which is why everyone is there in the first place.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

This is the guy that uses an app to monitor his son’s masturbation habits, so if he is against an app, you can be darn sure he’s serious

[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago

It will be funny as hell if out of all possible things it's TikTok that starts this round of GOP infighting.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

Another test case for loyalty to Trump.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that they're not interested in selling it should tell you all you need to know about what China wants to do with it

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure Mike 🤣😂

Pure theater.

Buying it was probably the plan all along

[–] ech@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What happened with Biden's promise to not enforce it? Is that not something the POTUS can do or is this just the legislative branch posturing?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would probably be up to the DoJ to sue any app store that didn't remove it, so yeah it's posturing.

Regardless, as I mentioned, the ban was to remove it from the app stores, not actually shut off functionality. Tiktok's messaging this weekend was a stunt.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For anyone who wonders what the stunt was about, just look at this fuckin shit

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Holy shit, no way in hell that was the actual message displayed. Its a joke right?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh fuck distopian timeline is moving forward pretty fast. So glad I dont live in the US and wont have to make the choice of living as a slave or dying for people that dont want to be freed.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

100% not a joke

It's not just to take it out of stores, the law states providing internet hosting services... Which would complicate it functioning here.

Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok).

[–] aimizo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Today is the last day of Biden’s presidency so he is completely irrelevant to what happens now.

[–] rjthyen@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

But doesn't that make it more apparent that bytedance is in on the ruse? Shut the app down while Biden is still president even though his administration says they do not plan to enforce the ban and then bring it back the second Trump is president? (They already brought it back with a notice that thanks President Trump)

[–] ech@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

It's not about Biden, it's about the executive branch. And the incoming dumbass has already said he's gonna save it, so it is relevant.