That's impressive.
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
651 points (97.8% liked)
News
36086 readers
3204 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel dirty saying good things about Sarah Palin, but she was brought on to fire up the base and did just that. Vance has managed to alienate the base. I don’t think the incels even like him at this point.
Yeah people forget how long people looked favorably at Palin. The response to Vance meanwhile was an immediate and visceral "no thank you"
Of course the incels don't like him. He argues that childless people should pay higher taxes. How did anyone think that would go over with the "never even had sex" constituency?
I think the incel crowd generally want to strip women of their rights because they see women's liberty as a main reason they can't get laid.
So, I'd imagine the childless cat women thing could hit with them because they'd be like "yeah, women should stop being so up-tight and have my babies!"
Or something like that.
yeah, single women with no kids are childless cat ladies, but single men with no kids are just victims of the uncompromising selfishness of childless cat ladies. sounds about right.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Sarah Palin was like a dog that peed on themselves because they're an idiot. Vance is like a dog that bites their owner because they're an idiot. Sure, Palin was dumb, but Vance is a real threat to all Americans.
Don't tell Kristi Noem. I bet she still keeps her favorite gravel pit in great condition, just in case.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Palin was a joke because John McCain was at the top of the ticket.
If it was she was second to Trump and being groomed by the Heritage Foundation and their Project 2025, she would be scary too.
But since then, he has faced a rash of bad headlines about his past comments calling Harris a "childless cat lady," his past support for a national abortion ban and even a baseless internet rumor about having sex with a couch.
It may be baseless, but it's quite plausible because he is just so...uh...the way he is. Trump, Vance, and RFK are all kinda weird. Hugging and kissing the flag, playing with dead things, etc etc.
Baseless? I thought "people are saying" was an acceptable level of fact checking. Donald certainly agrees with me.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
Palin was a joke. Vance is, frankly, scary.
Moreso if you are a couch.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Considering that Vance's biggest accomplishment so far is writing a best-selling book, in which he cosplays as a poor person while trashing rural Americans, this about checks out.
Do you think he wrote that book though?
Palin was at-least somewhat entertaining in her madness.
She also came across as ditzy, not creepily malicious.
Vance 100% knows what he’s doing. He accepted that he had to sell his soul to become a successful politician.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Palin alienated anyone vaguely in the middle, but on the other hand she had at least some particular support that she brought distinct from McCain (basically Tea Party folks that were not particularly excited by establishment republican nor McCain).
Vance doesn't have any particular support, he only gets indirect support for people who are "republican no matter what" or "MAGA all the way", but those people were already covered by Trump. Even in his own state his margin of victory was much slimmer than the other republicans that swept Ohio in 2022, and Ohio's not even a state considered to be a risk to Trump's campaign.
He was just a tremendously bad choice with no strategic benefit. The VP pick should somehow provide some coverage for demographics not hit by the presidential candidate, and Trump instead went with someone with very limited popularity that is a strict subset of people already supporting Trump.
After seeing what the cultists were going to do to Pence, and that Trump was going to allow it, no one else was interested in being his VP. The only option was a bootlicker.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
And there's not going to be any porn parody about couchfucker
Wait did we just find an exception to rule 34? I never thought I'd see the day...
You damn well know someone out there has drawn Vance absolutely raw dogging a leather couch and there's nothing you can do about it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
He's so spineless it's baffling that they thought this would be a good choice?
Trump thought that he'd appeal to hillbillies and poor Midwesterners. Clearly he didn't read Hilbilly Elegy beyond the title.
If he did, he would have learned that, much like Clarence Thomas with black people, Vance paints all poor people in Ohio and Kentucky as lazy welfare recipients who should just pull themselves up by their bootstraps* and work harder 🙄
*which was originally an expression for doing something literally impossible, as pulling on your own bootstraps would make you fall down.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
More unpopular or less popular?
I think there's a fun bit of linguistics there. If you say more unpopular it implies that both are unpopular and one is even more so. If you say less popular, it implies that they are both popular, but one is to a lesser degree.
load more comments
(2 replies)
His greatest accomplishment.
It was not an easy feat, but he prevailed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So you're saying he's less non-unpopular
Tech Oligarchs Test Tube Hillbilly
Common guys! It's funny!
I mean, yeah, I would be fine with leaving Palin alone in a room with my furniture.
Imagine fucking a couch and then being popular…
view more: next ›