this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
113 points (99.1% liked)

News

37495 readers
3152 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sheriff Kevin McMahill says Livelsberger sustained a gunshot wound to the head prior to the Cybertuck detonating; investigators believe it was self inflicted.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That follows. That would certainly confirm the police's initial assessment that this seemed like a deliberate act, not an accident or a car problem.

It's funny how fast people are to throw Tesla under the bus. I mean I hate musk too, but the problem here was clearly not the cybertruck... Blaming an ugly car is missing the point.

This was a political statement. It was self immolation. And it was notably blowing up a Musk-mobile at a Trump tower.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They blame tesla because it was a legitimate possibility that it just blew up for whatever reason.

Tesla cars have been known to do all kinds of stupid shit and the cybertruck already has so many other issues that it wouldn't be surprising in the slightest to find out faulty engineering caused it to blow up.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

When has a Tesla spontaneously burst into flames when it wasn’t user error or malfeasance?

Please provide reputable sources to back up your claim.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the record though, electric cars (even teslas) are actually significantly less likely to catch fire than gasoline engine cars. Statistically, ICE cars catch fire 11 times more frequently than teslas.

So while it was totally possible that it just randomly blew up, it's certainly not more likely because it's a Tesla.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not more likely because it's a tesla. More likely because it's a cybertruck

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Except it isn't.