Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
the San Francisco police department lacks the ability to conduct a thorough investigation into a case that includes issues such as cybersecurity and whistleblower protection.
As well as the ability to be objective when it comes to Silicon Valley billionaires, I bet.
That's who they ACTUALLY work for, after all.
They work for anyone who can ensure their sky-high wages and benefits and near-immunity from prosecution or firing. But yeah, that would be the billionaires who fund the predictable media drumbeat/circlejerk on "law and order" (read: prosecution for the poor, total invisibility for most "white collar" crime), who thereby are effectively the prime supporters of the police state. The billionaires hardly give a shit personally about policing or justice, beyond the basic level of "I just want clean streets and a safe home and car", but they use the law-n-order schtick as an obvious yet unbeatable tactic to buy almost any political outcome they desire.
Expect this to become more common.
In the handful of first person whistleblowing stories that have been reported, the whistleblower has always mentioned how hard their and their family’s lives became as a result and how close they came to suicide.
Anyone who chooses to whistleblow has the biggest balls among us and deserve our utmost respect. Now if only law enforcement weren’t working on behalf of the owner class…
Yeah, I fear that these calls for investigations may be a grief-ridden family grasping for some meaning. If there were some deeper nefarious goings on behind this death, then that might allow them to make sense of their pain. I've been fortunate to have not lost anyone to suicide, but I understand it's especially difficult to come to terms with.
I feel angry because as you allude to, retribution upon a whistleblower need not directly kill them in order to ruin their lives. Morally, I'd say that OpenAI may still be responsible for this death even if this wasn't an assassination. Unfortunately, the legal system isn't well suited to respond to diffuse responsibility, so the family is unlikely to find justice regardless (even considering that one version of "justice" would be OpenAI being held accountable for the original things that were highlighted by the whistleblower)
When I imagine how much pressure Balaji must've been under, and how I have felt under much milder circumstances, I can understand how that might've made a person feel suicidal. Blowing the whistle sucks because although it's rarely a case of just bringing the truth to light and letting the world do with that information what it will; becoming a whistleblower doesn't mean participating in a singular act of revelation, but adopting a new identity for the foreseeable future, as you continue to be defined by the one act, whether that's in terms of professional reputation, harassment of one's family, or being required to be a witness in court.
My greatest sympathies go to Balaji's loved ones.
Better investigate it quick. In a few weeks, it'll be a whole different FBI, one much more friendly to big tech companies.
I imagine the current one isn't filled with workers' champions either.