this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
137 points (93.1% liked)

News

36782 readers
2320 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was donvict's idea to ban 'em to begin with.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but didn't he recently meet with the owners of tick tock? I'm sure some money greased his slimy brain

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YASS he sure did meet with one of the owners

Jeffrey Yass, it was Jeffrey Yass, some billionaire investor who just so happened to be a big campaign donor

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Grifters gonna grift

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems to me that the supreme court shouldnt be able to be “urged” to rule the wants of an executive

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Have you not been paying attention? They’re just an old and shitty theatre troupe performing the whims of the highest bidder.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Just one more thing that American voters simply do not care about.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Way too late for that lol

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that make him pro-China?

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He’s pro-money and power. Initially, he indicated that he would let the ban pass. Then, TikTok execs went to Mar-a-lago and he has changed his tune. What changed? Probably they bribed him.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Weird to see trump and the ACLU on the same side for a change.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

ACLU is against it due to principals of freedom of speech not that TikTok is some worthwhile company.

Trump is against it because he wants a big bribe for them to continue to operate. He has always been a blackmail king so this is right up his alley.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

It's like RFK trying to ban medical commercials. I agree with him under this one circumstance, but for entirely different reasons lol.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

A broken clock…