this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
211 points (96.5% liked)

News

39113 readers
2396 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A rift has emerged within Donald Trump’s MAGA base over immigration, sparked by his appointment of Indian-born entrepreneur Sriram Krishnan as AI adviser.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy defended hiring high-skilled foreign workers, emphasizing the need for global talent in tech, while far-right figures like Laura Loomer and Matt Gaetz criticized the move as anti-MAGA.

The debate reflects deeper divisions between Trump’s traditional anti-immigration stance and his recent openness to legal immigration for skilled graduates, signaling potential conflicts within his incoming administration.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 83 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I don't fucking get it.

These are discussions that should be happening before there is a fucking election.

All these "freedom-loving" people who blindly vote for someone and give him carte blanche. That's not freedom.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 37 points 2 years ago

shoot/vote first, ask/read on the issues later.

the majority of Americans (trump voters and those who didn't vote at all) seem to be a bit stupid.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

They're fucking idiots. The best Trump could do before the election was to say he had 'concepts of a plan'. Any intelligent person would hear that and immediately full stop and say 'holy shit, this guy is clueless and without any plan whatsoever'

Of course to the MAGAt it means ' oh the plan must be so good he can't even tell us about it'

You thought the tax cheat that screws over his workers and well, everyone but himself, was going to work in your best interest? There's only one cure for MAGAts

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That line of thinking would be valid if anyone was interested in policy. Trump is only interested in two things- 1) getting elected and 2) getting revenge. He used Musk to get elected and now they have different priorities. This happened in his first administration.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump is only interested in two things- 1) getting elected and 2) getting revenge.

1a) staying out of jail

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You are correct

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not complicated; you say whatever you need to get elected in politics. Once elected, only money and a distant second, reelection, matters.

In this battle we have money against stupid racists. Guess which one the administration will serve? They'll wrap it up by doubling down on MX wall height or something retarded; it will be the first of many shit sandwiches Trump will stuff down his voters throats to their unending surprise.

Edit: well that didn't take long - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/28/trump-musk-h1b-visas

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

They voted for slogans not policy.

At least those who bothered to vote at all.

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Give them pistols and have them duel it out.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 23 points 2 years ago

Eat eachother alive!

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 22 points 2 years ago

How is anyone caught off guard by this?

The Republican strategy for at least the 50 or so years that I've been aware enough to pay attention has exactly and explicitly been to get the base all riled up with brazenly racist anti-immigrant rhetoric, make lots noise and spends lots of money intercepting/deporting some number of people, but ensure that enough still get/stay in, and are desperate enough, to meet the business demand for cheap and exploitable labor.

Trump and his cultists have been extra hateful and extra loud, but aside from that, this is all just business as usual.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Trumpets saying more H1B visas is anti-MAGA are all the ones without real power. Lara Loomer and Matt Gaetz have no real political power, or money. And what does Banon have other than some earned favors? So as much as I like the infighting, it's clear the result will be a consolidation of mouth pieces to the MAGA base.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Maybe Loomer will slash her own tires in retribution against herself again.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Still one of the funniest things ever. For anyone that doesnt get the reference.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Also, as much as Trump controls them, to an extent. His possibility for election (constitutional crisis not withstanding) is gone, so his power diminishes from an election point of view.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Normalcy is for Democratic losers. I don't expect "lame duck" to play out in normal ways for this incoming administration.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I just hope that they’ll be just too busy with their infighting to actually do some permanent lasting damage.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Neither do I, but part of trumps appeal for other Republicans is that he can bring votes. He might in 2 years, unlikely in 4, so the calculus has changed in terms of benefits of loyalty.

However it's clear you're not actually discussing in good faith, so I'll leave it there. Enjoy politics as a sport. You're making the world worse.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 2 years ago

Whatever, I'm just saying don't expect to win tomorrow's game with yesterday's rules. If that's a bad faith argument, so be it.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy defended hiring high-skilled foreign workers, emphasizing the need for global talent in tech, while far-right figures like Laura Loomer and Matt Gaetz criticized the move

I'm critical of it too, but not for the same reason as Loomer and Gaetz. My problem with it isn't that it hurts America, but that helps America TOO much. If all of the best and brightest are coming to the US, they're leaving their nations of origin, depleting the talent pool of those nations. It leaves those nations disadvantaged relative to the US, and it's not fair for the US to have that advantage, because we are already the world's dominant economic superpower. We can't keep taking resources (in this case labor and intellectual resources) from poorer nations, to help generate profit for our wealthy elite.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Things being "not fair" is the thought process of children. The sooner you stop believing in it the sooner you'll be better off in life.

Edit. Not attacking you at all, just pointing it out.

[–] audaxdreik@pawb.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was brought up on this harsh truth by my parents just like a lot of people, I assume, but I no longer believe it.

Sure, I believe we all owe it to ourselves and others to put hard work into the system, but there should be an inherent sense of fairness (or call it equality if you will, I don't want to get bogged down in the tedium of definitions right now). If the system is unfair, we should be working to make it more fair. It's not satisfactory to simply leave it as it is, broken, and tell everyone else to deal with it when they may not have the resources to do so.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I say I refuse. I do not believe.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

I agree.

Fairness and Justice are human concepts, not natural laws, therefore not guaranteed. But they can be built into our systems and into our collective values.

What kind of world do we want to build?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Equality, yes. That's a different thing.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My life is fine, thank you.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I didn't say otherwise.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's no feud. This is just the general type of cognitive dissonance you get when you combine relentless hateful messaging with the fact that the moneyed class don't believe any of it. Cheap labor is obviously more important, so the propaganda people will keep up the hate/fear, while perhaps there won't be quite as many round-ups as we thought.

Edit: Feel the need to add I think these headlines depicting "fueds" are obnoxiously disingenuous.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago

I love watching them rip each other apart.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

LetThemFight.gif