this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
331 points (97.4% liked)

News

36043 readers
2853 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr does not meet the legal requirement of a New York resident and therefore cannot be on the state's election ballot, a judge has ruled.

Kennedy's claim of a New York address as his "place of residence" on nominating petitions was a "false statement", said Judge Christina Ryba.

“Given the size and appearance of the spare bedroom as shown in the photographs admitted into evidence, the Court finds Kennedy’s testimony that he may return to that bedroom to reside with his wife, family members, multiple pets, and all of his personal belongings to be highly improbable, if not preposterous,” the judge wrote.

As a result, the petitions were considered invalid. Mr Kennedy has rejected the judge's ruling and vows to appeal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why doesn’t he just claim residence where he actually lives?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That won't get him on the ballots he wants to siphon votes from, which is the entire purpose of his campaign.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

i still don't get it. it is not like you need to reside in NY to be able to appear in the NY presidential ballot

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's that he lied on his forms about his residence. These people are fucked up. No idea why he needed to lie about living in NY, but when you fill out these kinds of forms, you're not allowed to fuck around, rightly.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

oh, i understand why he was disqualified. but like you, it doesn't make any sense as to why he would lie. i guess you can trust a brain worm to fill a form accurately?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it doesn't make any sense as to why he would lie

It seems that some people just can't help themselves...

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

"The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves"

US Constitution Amendment 12

The presidential and vice presidential candidates that the electors vote for cannot be from the same state.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I asked the same question in another thread, answer is "legacy election rules that are silly in today's context":

https://lemmy.world/comment/11736790

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

it is not like you need to reside in NY to be able to appear in the NY presidential ballot

No, but you do need to fill in the application forms accurately and honestly.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would running for president get him on all the ballots?

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 years ago

Nope, most states require either a certain percentage/number of registered voters for a party or a state-wide petition to get onto the ballot. The only 3rd party on all 50 states' ballot is the Libertarian party. The Green party is a distant 4th place, as they often need to regather signatures and new petitions every 2-4 years.

If a new party was formed for 2028, it might get enough ground in one state, not any to really sway the balance of the Electoral College.

[–] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which ballots are those? You think RFK has any chance of flipping California?? (Or New York for that matter?)

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He has absolutely no shot of winning any electoral votes or even a state's popular vote. RFK is not a serious candidate. He's a crazy person who happens to have a well known name that others are using to try and spoil an election.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yes, that's the point.

If he falsified his permanent residence so that he could side step a (admittedly stupid) rule that state electors votes don't count if both the president and vice president candidates are from their state, then he falsified his application for nothing, since he has no chance of winning CA in the first place.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We said the same thing about Trump 8 years ago...

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

His VP is also from California, so California electors can’t choose them.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A President and Vice-President can't both be from California?

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s from the 12th amendment. A state elector must vote for at least one candidate from a state other than their own. So electors from Nevada could place both their Presidential and Vice Presidential electoral votes with an all-California ticket but California electors may not. There was talk of Kamala picking Newsom for VP but she’d have to change her residency for that to happen. Everyone would know that would be BS and possibly cost her California’s electoral votes or her candidacy in the second state, so she picked Walz instead (not the only reason but you get the idea). Kennedy got caught pulling a fast one so here we are.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

that's fucking wild. I'd never heard of that aspect of the college

[–] sockpuppet5@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He can't put anywhere else, because his legal residence is in New York.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

But he lives in California.

If you don't actually reside at your legal residence, it's invalid. It's like moving to a new house and not updating your driver's license. You don't get to claim that you live at your old house - your license just becomes invalid until you fix it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Oh no, I guess he'll never be president now. How sad.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

The scary part is that, according to John Oliver, he could be Trump's secretary of HHS if elected. Which is close to as bad in his case.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Okay I'm not in any way shape or form a fan or advocate for Kennedy, in fact I find him ridiculous in every way conceivable but I'm very confused. Since when does a presidential candidate need to have a residence in the state in order to be on the ballot?

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not that he has to have a residence in New York, it's that the address that he listed as his residence, in New York, on the application for candidacy submitted to New York, isn't really his residence. The article mentions other states may follow suit with the applications he submitted to them.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah yes, now I'm seeing that he actually lives in California. Which why he has chosen to list his residence that he doesn't actually live at as his permanent residence for his god damned presidential race is fucking beyond me. Just more ridiculous from a completely ridiculous person.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago

I read somewhere else that it's because his running mate is also from California, and for some reason you can't be from the same state as your running mate or something like that?

[–] Zatore@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe we should stop asking people their residence to get on the ballot. Before you know it people will just start writing in "prison"

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago

Haha, Nice one.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

He was really gonna split the crazy person vote too...

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Here is his acknowledgement and explanation if anyone is interested:

https://youtu.be/LHg3_iYIBVQ?si=fGQiaY3IlwT0XJ2s

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

so he doesn't live in new york, but he got his falcon license there.

[–] msage@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

Why should anyone care?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

You have to be a homeowner in New York to run for president?

load more comments
view more: next ›