this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Asklemmy

47426 readers
805 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a 2010 Toyota Corolla. She's been my trusty steed for the last 14 years and is in good working order. I recognize she won't last forever, and if, god forbid (mostly for her) I get in an accident, I will need to get a new car. So what dumb cars do you drive, and what would you replace them with?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you clarify exactly what you mean by a "dumb car"? Do you just mean that it doesn't have a screen in the cockpit? Or something else?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not OP, but my most recent car is a 2016 Hyundai Accent, and I think it's perfect. The doors and ignition operate with physical keys, the displays are all physical indicators directly behind the wheel, all the controls have tactile, physical buttons instead of a touchscreen, no infotainment system, and no subscription options.

I don't think I'd ever want a car more "smart" than that, but I'm not sure such a thing even exists anymore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Internet connected (smart) or non-internet connected (dumb). At least that’s what this phrase means with all other context.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Understood, but OP mentioned that he wanted something without a backup camera, so that's why I was asking for clarification.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Get something similar but cheaper. Those things spend decades in the sands and humid cimates and they're still rolling around. That Toyota will probably outlive you and your kids if you treat it well.

They're like those Diesel powered Mercedes from the 90s but much cheaper and easier to fix.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

And not as good

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2018 Subaru Forester

It might be a bit more updated than most, but in general less smart than most cars today.

  • Still have to press a button on the key to unlock the doors, or use the convenient key.
  • Need to put the key into the ignition to start.
  • Doors do not automatically lock out unlock.
  • Manual parking break.
  • Rear door is 100% manual (if you didn't count un/lock with key fob).
  • Basic Bluetooth functionality.
  • Equipped with OnStar, and Sirius.
  • Shipped with 3G cellular, which no longer works. They do offer a free upgrade, I never bothered.

By my own assessment, it's the dumbest modern car you can get.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

n assessment, it’s the dumbest modern car you can

Onstar tracks your driving habits and reports the data to insurers, even if you do not have Onstar actrivated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Dumb car" is kind of relative. Computer engine controls have been around since the mid 1970's. And while the first ones were not very good, they have become pretty darned reliable over the intervening years. And as someone who has owned cars and other heavy equipment with mechanical points and down draft and up draft carburetors, you won't ever see me willingly own a car with any of that anymore.

If you really want to minimize the electronics as much as possible, look at 1990's to no later than 2010 models.

Though to be fair, much of the problems with cars are caused by the accessories like power windows, door locks, air conditioning, and power seats. Those are far more problematic than the basic car itself.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think they mean all the newer techno crap that cars have like touch screens and the like not power windows, AC and engine related stuff thats been around for decades. And I agree with that. I want a car that has the basics and yeet the touch screens and other garbage no one asked for but it seems theres not really any choice anymore.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those touch screens are all a part of the accessories. And I dislike them intensely also. I also find it very disheartening that in some new cars a software up date is needed to make the dock locks work. A friend had to take his mother's Kia in to rematch the door locks to a new key. They needed to remove the door handles and plug them into a computer to do so.

The last new car I bought, (2015 Jeep Patriot), made me search EVERY car dealer in 2 states before I found one that had manual door locks and manual windows. I often haul dogs around with me and while they are quite good at locking doors and rolling up windows, they really, really suck at rolling them down or unlocking the doors. It took me a couple of months of weekly searching to finally find one for sale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Kia are bastards when it comes to anti consumer practices, my 2012 Kia had an airbag warning light come on right before it’s MOT and my usual garage said they couldn’t read the fault code, I tried specialised diagnostic readers and even borrowed a garage spec one from a neighbour and still couldn’t get anything from it.

In the end I had to take it to Kia themselves and get them to read the fault code for £130, turns out the fault was exactly what everyone thought it was but couldn’t confirm and now they want £750 to replace a single airbag module that needs to be coded to the car once it’s installed. My car has been in their garage since the start of January and there’s still no sign of the part arriving yet but I can’t install one myself because of the fact that only Kia can recode it to match the car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For about ten years prior to 2020, I only had a company car. I've gone the past four without a car but I'm looking around for something to make it easier to visit family and take short trips.

Not only is the cost of a new car mindmelting, all the crap they put in them now is detrimental to me considering anything made in the past few years. I would sooner opt for a car with roll down windows and an AM radio than have to drive down the street with a giant computer screen shining in my face pinging me with all sorts of distractions. And that's coming from someone who spent over ten years installing car stereos and remote starts, etc.

I don't know what to do either. I'm looking at cars made around 2010-2015. I'd probably drive less than 2,000 miles a year but I'd still worry about wasting money on something that isn't going to last me at least ten years. I also have a thing for cars that feel good to drive, typically German cars, so these cheap little Hyundais and such probably aren't something I'd consider.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

for less than 2000 miles a year its likely better to just rent?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like Enterprise? I've looked into this. First, the demand goes up / supply goes down when everyone without a car wants to rent a car for the holidays. Second, there's only one facility anywhere near me. Third, they have limited hours when you can pick up and drop off making it unreasonably difficult (only open til 12 on Saturdays, closed Sundays).

I also looked into car sharing. I forget the name of the service but I've spoken with people who have rented out their cars for it. It's a scam. People have had thousands of dollars withdrawn from their bank accounts for minor body damage without warning and without evidence that they were responsible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There's some locally run car shares that are better. Here in the Twin Cities we have Evie, maybe your area has something similar?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many Toyotas. Even their newest series LandCruiser is doing well and will continue the legacy of doing well because durable mechanical simplicity is what it brings to the competitive table.

A lot of Toyotas last a long time and are easy to work on. That in turn makes them popular, making parts for them even cheaper.

Honestly? Consider grabbing another Corolla if you liked your Corolla. The Toyota price tag pays itself off in longevity and low ongoing cost. They just don't die and do their job well for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly? Consider grabbing another Corolla if you liked your Corolla

Agreed. My 2020 corolla has very little of the digital bells and whistles that are increasingly getting in the way of things "just working" in the driving experience.

Still, more than I'd like, but much less than any other vehicle I've driven in the last 10 years.

And, as far as I can tell, it doesn't have any way of "phoning home" to tell the corporate overlords if I'm doing something they don't approve of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can't quote it offhand, but I know I've read an article recently about corporations phoning home and I believe Toyota was on the list. I'll see if I can dig it up.

That said, I agree about the Toyotas. Even if they DO phone home and we have to deal with that crap, they're bulletproof and deserve their reputation.

Edit: guess I never ended up reading the whole article, but it was Mozilla. Hopefully this helps: https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That report is based on reading privacy policies, it doesn't actually assess what cars / brands actually do or are capable of

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've read through your comments, and honestly, you're just going to want to buy an old civic or another Corolla, and if you need to, swap in a new engine. You really have to choose working on an old car to keep it running, or live with even the basic standard safety features like a backup camera. Keep in mind that the new lane assist or collision avoidance stuff can be turned off in virtually all new cars. Plenty of new cars don't have an obnoxious infotainment screen as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Keep in mind that the new lane assist or collision avoidance stuff can be turned off in virtually all new cars.

Manufacturers are making this more and more difficult to control by the user.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of new cars don’t have an obnoxious infotainment screen as well.

maybe list them for OP instead of hinting at their existence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, I can't list every one of them? It all depends on if you find a 6 inch screen too big or something Tesla sized.

I know my Ford Maverick and my wife's Kia Soul are pretty tame with the infotainment system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

just having a couple brands and models to look into is pretty helpful. I know i'm sick to death of massive screens with touchscreen buttons for everything. i drive my step mother's recent model BMW sometimes and trying to just change the radio station is a chore that involves clicking accept on a screen with a huge disclaimer warning you not to get distracted by the touchscreen while driving before you can even operate it.