this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
260 points (98.5% liked)

News

35774 readers
1868 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the US, mental and substance-use disorders are the biggest factors to blame, along with musculoskeletal diseases that affect joints, bones and muscles. The discrepancy is even higher for American women, whose healthspan-lifespan gap is, on average, 2.6 years wider than their male counterparts’ – because they tend to live longer and are also more likely to have musculoskeletal conditions.

The paper is here

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Weird comparison, since Lesotho is one of the worlds lowest on life expectancy. This also skew the comparison to other countries, and AFAIK Norwegians have way higher quality of life in the last years of living, despite living longer.
A better graph would be how many years are lived in good health.

Still impressive Americans manage to do so well, considering their shitty living conditions.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Second best third world country on the planet!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wow, Bloomberg wasted no time in finding a study that sort of relates to the hugest issue of the day.

I love science, it's such a click honeypot. And best of all no one gives a shit if it was done by a reporter in five minutes of scrolling tweets or an actual academic body with credentials and ethics! It's "a study"! How much more official do you want, people?

Another for the pyre of "studies reported on that suggest something everyone knew many years ago"

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this ain't news. it's been known for phht.. decades?

Yeah, but we gotta brag every once in awhile about being number 1.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn’t this just imply that end-of-life care is more successful here? It doesn’t seem like a particularly useful statistic on its own.